Seifert Paul S, Huibregtse Barbara A, Polovick Jason, Poff Bradley
Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA 01752, USA.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2007 Oct-Dec;8(4):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2007.08.002.
The early response to the TAXUS Express2 paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) system was compared to the response to the Express2 bare metal stent (BMS) system in porcine arteries.
Swine coronary arteries were implanted with overlapping PES or BMS and examined at 1, 2, 4, 10, and 20 days postimplantation using scanning electron microscopy or light microscopy.
Vascular healing in terms of strut coverage, reendothelialization, degree of inflammation, and absence of thrombus was equivalent in both groups from 1 to 20 days. Interstrut member spaces were unaffected by stent deployment and remained covered with endothelium from Day 1. In both groups at 2 days, small patches of endothelial cells covered approximately 5-10% of the stent surface. At 4 days, endothelial cell coverage progressed to nearly 50% in both groups. After 10 days, endothelial cell strut coverage was nearly complete (>90%), with regions of incomplete coverage located primarily in strut overlap regions in both groups. BMS exhibited a fibrocellular neointima and no parastrut fibrin, whereas PES exhibited a developing but immature fibrocellular neointima and prominent parastrut fibrin. By Day 20, an endothelialized neointima was present in both groups, with comparable coverage of proximal and distal stented regions. The neointima of PES was more fibrocellular and parastrut fibrin was still comparable to that at 10 days.
Early vascular response was comparable for both PES and BMS, with similar rates of reendothelialization, limited inflammatory response, and absence of thrombus, but differed parastrut fibrin clearance and neointimal maturation rate.
在猪动脉中,比较了TAXUS Express2紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)系统与Express2裸金属支架(BMS)系统的早期反应。
在猪冠状动脉中植入重叠的PES或BMS,并在植入后1、2、4、10和20天使用扫描电子显微镜或光学显微镜进行检查。
从第1天到第20天,两组在支架覆盖、再内皮化、炎症程度和无血栓方面的血管愈合情况相当。支架间间隙不受支架植入的影响,从第1天起就一直被内皮覆盖。两组在第2天时,小片内皮细胞覆盖了约5%-10%的支架表面。在第4天时,两组的内皮细胞覆盖率均进展至近50%。10天后,两组的内皮细胞对支架的覆盖几乎完成(>90%),不完全覆盖区域主要位于支架重叠区域。BMS表现为纤维细胞性新生内膜且无支架旁纤维蛋白,而PES表现为正在形成但不成熟的纤维细胞性新生内膜以及明显的支架旁纤维蛋白。到第20天时,两组均出现了内皮化的新生内膜,近端和远端支架区域的覆盖率相当。PES的新生内膜纤维细胞更多,支架旁纤维蛋白仍与第10天时相当。
PES和BMS的早期血管反应相当,再内皮化率相似,炎症反应有限且无血栓形成,但在支架旁纤维蛋白清除和新生内膜成熟率方面存在差异。