Mitchell Cassie S, Lee Robert H
Laboratory for Neuroengineering, The Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332-0535, USA.
J Neural Eng. 2007 Dec;4(4):380-9. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/4/004. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
Recent experimental and theoretical work continues to explore the mechanisms and implications of neurotransmitter spillover. Here we examine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) kinetics to determine their implication(s) in glutamate spillover by comparing two mechanistically different NMDA-R models, the 5-state Lester and Jahr (LJ) model and the 8-state Banke and Traynelis (BT) model, within the context of a glutamate spillover model. We employ a search-survey-and-summarize strategy to analyze the relationships within model behavior (model relational analysis) and form a model output landscape. Our results indicate that model relational analysis can reveal differences in models whose outputs would be considered the same. The analysis reveals that the BT model, with its more complex kinetics, is less reliant on diffusion compared to the LJ version, resulting in differences in the relationships between open probability and glutamate concentration despite the fact that both model versions were able to produce the same target output values. Additionally, model relational analysis is able to distinguish between the BT and LJ NMDA-R model versions even though factor analysis indicates that the overall model output space dimensions are the same for both NMDA-R models. Furthermore, the work presented here suggests that model relational analysis may be broadly applicable as a means to examine the complex interactions hidden within overall model behavior.
近期的实验和理论研究持续探索神经递质溢出的机制及影响。在此,我们通过在谷氨酸溢出模型的背景下比较两种机制不同的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDA-R)模型,即五态的莱斯特和雅尔(LJ)模型以及八态的班克和特拉伊内利斯(BT)模型,来研究NMDA-R动力学,以确定它们在谷氨酸溢出中的作用。我们采用搜索-调查-总结策略来分析模型行为之间的关系(模型关系分析)并形成模型输出格局。我们的结果表明,模型关系分析能够揭示那些输出结果被认为相同的模型之间的差异。分析显示,具有更复杂动力学的BT模型与LJ版本相比,对扩散的依赖较小,尽管两个模型版本都能够产生相同的目标输出值,但这导致了开放概率与谷氨酸浓度之间关系的差异。此外,尽管因子分析表明两个NMDA-R模型的整体模型输出空间维度相同,但模型关系分析仍能够区分BT和LJ NMDA-R模型版本。此外,本文所展示的研究表明,模型关系分析可能作为一种广泛适用的手段,用于检查隐藏在整体模型行为中的复杂相互作用。