Suppr超能文献

美容整形手术中的对照试验:一项为期16年的分析。

Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis.

作者信息

Becker A, Blümle A, Antes G, Bannasch H, Torio-Padron N, Stark G B, Momeni A

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Mar;32(2):359-62. doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9075-9.

Abstract

Aesthetic surgery is one pillar of plastic surgery. Thus, not surprisingly, journals exist that focus predominantly on advances within this subspecialty. However, rarely has the process of systematic reviewing that identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) been conducted within this subspecialty. All original articles published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were analyzed to identify all RCTs and CCTs. The proportion of RCTs and CCTs in all original articles was determined, and the quality of reporting was assessed on the basis of established quality items. Additional parameters were investigated including reporting of statistically significant differences, type of institution, and country affiliation of the first author. Of the 1,048 original articles analyzed, 11 (1%) and 24 (2.3%) articles met the inclusion criteria for RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Only two studies were single blinded, whereas only one study reported on successful double blinding and appropriate allocation concealment. Notably, these trials were RCTs. Participant dropout was reported in one study. Statistically significant differences were reported in 18 trials, 6 of which were RCTs. The annual publication of RCTs has increased over the past 5 years. North America and Europe contributed a total of 28 controlled trials (80%). Controlled trials are being conducted in aesthetic surgery at a strikingly low rate. However, a recent increase in published RCTs reflects the recognition that performing outcome studies is pivotal in moving practice toward a foundation based on assessment by outcome. The quality of reporting, however, needs improvement.

摘要

美容外科是整形外科学的一个分支。因此,毫不奇怪,有一些期刊主要关注这一亚专业领域的进展。然而,在这个亚专业领域内,很少进行过系统评价以确定随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验(CCT)。对发表在《美容整形外科学》上的所有原创文章进行分析,以找出所有的RCT和CCT。确定了所有原创文章中RCT和CCT的比例,并根据既定的质量项目评估报告质量。还研究了其他参数,包括统计学显著差异的报告、机构类型和第一作者的所属国家。在分析的1048篇原创文章中,分别有11篇(1%)和24篇(2.3%)文章符合RCT和CCT的纳入标准。只有两项研究是单盲的,而只有一项研究报告了成功的双盲和适当的分配隐藏。值得注意的是,这些试验都是RCT。有一项研究报告了参与者退出情况。18项试验报告了统计学显著差异,其中6项是RCT。在过去5年中,RCT的年度发表量有所增加。北美和欧洲共贡献了28项对照试验(80%)。美容外科领域进行对照试验的比例极低。然而,最近发表的RCT有所增加,这反映出人们认识到进行结果研究对于将实践转向基于结果评估的基础至关重要。然而,报告质量仍需提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验