Lohmeyer J A, Machens H-G, Lange T, Siemers F, Reichert B, Mailänder P
Plastische, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Intensiveinheit für Schwerbrandverletzte, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Dec;39(6):396-402. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965732.
In avulsion-type injuries of the fingers recovery of blood circulation is one of the major obstacles. The indication for finger reconstruction is discussed controversely, being influenced by the patient's needs, the degree of damage to the soft tissue and the prospects of success of the healing process. In this study we present our results after reconstruction of avulsion-type injuries of the fingers. Indications for finger reconstruction will be assessed in consideration of the expected outcome.
From 1999 to 2006 we treated 18 patients with finger level avulsion injuries. 15 casualties were caused by rings and three by ropes looped around a digit. The median age at injury was 23 (12 - 66) years. All patients were examined by an independent observer, who did not participate in the operation. Criteria were functional outcome and patient's complaints and satisfaction. Sensibility was evaluated by 2-point discrimination applying the Greulich star. Finger mobility was assessed with the Buck-Gramcko goniometer.
According to the classification of Urbaniak as modified by Kay, 2 patients ranked in class II, 3 in class III and 13 suffered from complete avulsion-amputations (class IV). Of the latter, 8 allowed primary reconstruction of the blood circulation. Two fingers required early or late secondary amputation. After finger reconstruction, patients spent a median time of 18 (12 - 32) days in hospital while primary amputation resulted in a shorter stay of 4 (2 - 5) days. Active motion after replantation in the proximal interphalangeal joint was reduced on average to 64 (25 - 100) degrees. The distal interphalangeal joint nearly ankylosed in all patients following replantation except for one case with an active motion of 40 degrees . Good sensibility could be achieved in one case, protective sensibility in three and none in two patients. All patients with preserved fingers would again decide in favour of finger replantation.
In specialised centres replantation of complete avulsion-type finger amputations can be achieved. The decision for or against replantation should only be made after microsurgical assessment of the severed soft tissue and in consideration of the patient's specific demands. With the right indication for reconstruction, the patient's satisfaction often outweighs even poor functional outcomes.
在手指撕脱伤中,血液循环的恢复是主要障碍之一。手指重建的适应症存在争议,受到患者需求、软组织损伤程度以及愈合过程成功前景的影响。在本研究中,我们展示了手指撕脱伤重建后的结果。将根据预期结果评估手指重建的适应症。
1999年至2006年,我们治疗了18例手指离断撕脱伤患者。15例由戒指导致,3例由缠绕手指的绳索导致。受伤时的中位年龄为23岁(12 - 66岁)。所有患者均由一名未参与手术的独立观察者进行检查。标准为功能结果、患者的主诉及满意度。采用格吕利希星状图通过两点辨别觉评估感觉功能。使用巴克 - 格拉姆科测角仪评估手指活动度。
根据凯修改后的乌尔巴尼亚克分类法,2例属于Ⅱ级,3例属于Ⅲ级,13例为完全撕脱离断伤(Ⅳ级)。其中,8例允许对手指血液循环进行一期重建。2例手指需要早期或晚期二期截肢。手指重建后,患者住院中位时间为18天(12 - 32天),而一期截肢患者住院时间较短,为4天(2 - 5天)。再植后近端指间关节的主动活动平均减少至64度(25 - 100度)。除1例主动活动为40度外,所有患者再植后远端指间关节几乎均发生强直。1例患者感觉良好,3例有保护性感觉,2例无感觉。所有保留手指的患者仍会再次选择手指再植。
在专业中心,完全撕脱型手指离断伤的再植是可以实现的。是否进行再植的决定应仅在对离断软组织进行显微外科评估后,并考虑患者的具体需求时做出。有正确的重建适应症时,即使功能结果不佳,患者的满意度通常也会更高。