London Brian, Nabet Behnam, Fisher Andrew R, White Brigitte, Sammel Mary D, Doty Richard L
Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, Smell and Taste Center, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):159-66. doi: 10.1002/ana.21293.
Although olfaction is often compromised by such factors as head trauma, viruses, and toxic agents, the olfactory epithelium and sectors of the olfactory bulb have the potential for regeneration. This study assessed the degree to which olfactory function changes over time in patients presenting to a university-based smell and taste center with complaints of olfactory dysfunction and the influences of etiology (eg, head trauma, upper respiratory infection), sex, age, smoking behavior, degree of initial dysfunction, and other factors on such change.
Well-validated odor identification tests were administered to 542 patients on 2 occasions separated from one another by 3 months to 24 years. Multivariable regression and chi2 analyses assessed the influences of the variables on the longitudinal changes in olfactory test scores.
On average, smell test scores improved modestly over time. Patient age, severity of initial olfactory loss, and the duration of dysfunction at first testing were significant predictors of the amount of the change. Etiology, sex, time between the two test administrations, and initial smoking behavior were not significant predictors. The percentage of anosmic and microsmic patients exhibiting statistically significant change in function was 56.72 and 42.86%, respectively. However, only 11.31% of anosmic and 23.31% of microsmic patients regained normal age-related function over time.
Some recovery can be expected in a significant number of patients who experience smell loss. The amount of recovery depends on the degree of initial loss, age, and the duration of loss. Etiology, per se, is not a significant determinant of prognosis, in contrast with what is commonly believed.
尽管嗅觉常因头部创伤、病毒和有毒物质等因素而受损,但嗅上皮和嗅球的部分区域具有再生潜力。本研究评估了在一家大学嗅觉和味觉中心就诊、主诉嗅觉功能障碍的患者中,嗅觉功能随时间变化的程度,以及病因(如头部创伤、上呼吸道感染)、性别、年龄、吸烟行为、初始功能障碍程度和其他因素对这种变化的影响。
对542名患者进行了两次经过充分验证的气味识别测试,两次测试间隔3个月至24年。多变量回归和卡方分析评估了这些变量对嗅觉测试分数纵向变化的影响。
平均而言,嗅觉测试分数随时间有适度改善。患者年龄、初始嗅觉丧失的严重程度以及首次测试时功能障碍的持续时间是变化量的显著预测因素。病因、性别、两次测试之间的时间间隔和初始吸烟行为不是显著的预测因素。嗅觉丧失和嗅觉减退患者中功能出现统计学显著变化的比例分别为56.72%和42.86%。然而,随着时间推移,只有11.31%的嗅觉丧失患者和23.31%的嗅觉减退患者恢复到与年龄相关的正常功能。
相当一部分嗅觉丧失的患者有望实现一定程度的恢复。恢复程度取决于初始丧失的程度、年龄和丧失的持续时间。与普遍看法相反,病因本身并不是预后的显著决定因素。