Boyce Melissa A, Lindsay D Stephen, Brimacombe C A E
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3050 STN CSC, V8W 3P5, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):439-53. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9125-5. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
This research examined the impact of eyewitness identification decisions on student-investigators. Undergraduates played the role of police investigators and interviewed student-witnesses who had been shown either a good or poor view of the perpetrator in a videotaped crime. Based on information obtained from the witness, student-investigators then chose a suspect from a database containing information about potential suspects and rated the probability that their suspect was the culprit. Investigators then administered a photo lineup to witnesses, and re-rated the probability that their suspect was guilty. Student-investigators were highly influenced by eyewitness identification decisions, typically overestimating the information gained from the identification decision (except under conditions that led witnesses to be very accurate), and were generally unable to differentiate between accurate and inaccurate witnesses.
这项研究考察了目击证人指认决定对学生调查员的影响。本科生扮演警察调查员的角色,对在一段犯罪录像中被展示了对犯罪者清晰或模糊视角的学生证人进行询问。基于从证人那里获得的信息,学生调查员随后从一个包含潜在嫌疑人信息的数据库中挑选出一名嫌疑人,并对他们所挑选的嫌疑人是罪犯的可能性进行评分。然后,调查员给证人进行照片列队辨认,并再次对他们所挑选的嫌疑人有罪的可能性进行评分。学生调查员受到目击证人指认决定的高度影响,通常高估从指认决定中获得的信息(除了在导致证人非常准确的情况下),并且一般无法区分准确和不准确的证人。