Sachdeo Rajesh
Epilepsy Program, Jersey Shore Medical Center, Neptune, New Jersey 07754, USA.
Neurology. 2007 Dec 11;69(24 Suppl 3):S23-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000302372.08983.38.
Monotherapy of epilepsy is usually preferable to polytherapy for a variety of reasons. However, investigational or newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are typically evaluated as add-on therapy in patients with refractory seizures. Because coadministered drugs are subject to drug interactions, add-on trials of AEDs do not necessarily address the utility of a new AED as monotherapy or its use in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, in whom monotherapy is usually sufficient. Monotherapy clinical trials are difficult to design because randomizing epilepsy patients to placebo or pseudoplacebo is considered unethical, and results from active-drug noninferiority designs are difficult to interpret. Active-drug superiority designs have been developed in an attempt to provide useful information about the monotherapeutic efficacy of new AEDs. The conversion to monotherapy trial design, introduced in the late 1970s, provides for initial add-on of an investigational agent to a preexisting drug in patients with uncontrolled seizures, followed by gradual discontinuation of the preexisting treatment and an eventual monotherapy phase of the investigational agent. Conversion to monotherapy trials are typically of short duration and have been criticized for failing to provide adequate time for titration to optimal dose, an inability to examine tolerance development or long-term safety, and possibly placing enrolled patients at increased risk for morbidity, but they have been used to obtain data about monotherapy efficacy sufficient for regulatory authority approval. Relevant clinical trial data are needed to guide treatment choices in patients who have failed previous monotherapy. To date, large-scale prospective trials comparing monotherapy with old and new AEDs have not shown superior efficacy of the new AEDs but have demonstrated their better tolerability and safety. It is hoped that use of appropriately designed monotherapy clinical trials will help to identify a new generation of AEDs in the future for monotherapy in epilepsy patients.
出于多种原因,癫痫的单药治疗通常优于联合治疗。然而,研究性或新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)通常在难治性癫痫发作患者中作为附加疗法进行评估。由于联合使用的药物会发生药物相互作用,AEDs的附加试验不一定能解决新AED作为单药治疗的效用问题,也无法解决其在新诊断癫痫患者中的应用问题,而这些患者通常单药治疗就足够了。单药治疗临床试验很难设计,因为将癫痫患者随机分配到安慰剂或伪安慰剂组被认为是不道德的,而且活性药物非劣效性设计的结果很难解释。已经开发了活性药物优效性设计,试图提供有关新AED单药治疗疗效的有用信息。20世纪70年代末引入的转换为单药治疗试验设计,是先在癫痫发作未得到控制的患者中,将一种研究药物初始附加到现有的药物上,然后逐渐停用现有的治疗方法,最终进入研究药物的单药治疗阶段。转换为单药治疗试验通常持续时间较短,并且因未能提供足够时间滴定至最佳剂量、无法检查耐受性发展或长期安全性,以及可能使入组患者发病风险增加而受到批评,但它们已被用于获取足以获得监管机构批准的单药治疗疗效数据。需要相关临床试验数据来指导先前单药治疗失败的患者的治疗选择。迄今为止,比较新旧AEDs单药治疗的大规模前瞻性试验尚未显示新AEDs有更高的疗效,但已证明它们具有更好的耐受性和安全性。希望使用设计适当的单药治疗临床试验将有助于在未来识别出新一代用于癫痫患者单药治疗的AEDs。