• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在意大利基于人群的宫颈异常筛查中对FocalPoint GS系统性能的评估。

Evaluation of the FocalPoint GS system performance in an Italian population-based screening of cervical abnormalities.

作者信息

Passamonti Basilio, Bulletti Simonetta, Camilli Maria, D'Amico Maria Rosaria, Di Dato Eugenio, Gustinucci Daniela, Martinelli Nadia, Malaspina Morena, Spita Nicoletta

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, Cytology Center, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2007 Nov-Dec;51(6):865-71. doi: 10.1159/000325862.

DOI:10.1159/000325862
PMID:18077978
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the FocalPoint Location-Guided Screening (FPGS) performance in computer-assisted primary screening of Papanicolaou-stained cervicovaginal smears.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 37,306 routine consecutive conventional Pap slides were prospectively processed on the FPGS. Each slid designated by the instrument as Review was reported according to results obtained using a GS Review Station. Subsequently, all slides under went conventional manual rapid screening and reported results were compared.

RESULTS

Of the slides initially submitted to the FPGS, 34,004 (91.15%) were qualified for scanning. Within these slides, the system classified 7,399 (21.8%) as needing No Further Review and ranked to Review the remaining 26,605 (78.2%). Of the 418 cellular abnormalities found, 409 were classified for Review by FPGS and 9 minor grade lesions were classified in the "No Further Review" population. Overall, 352 (86%) of atypical squamous cell (ASC)+ were ranked in high-score quintiles, including 96 (94%) of the 102 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse. Location-guided software identified cellular abnormalities, in the automatically selected fields of view, in 378 (92%) of the ranked abnormal slides, showing a sensitivity > 95% on SILs.

CONCLUSION

Slide ranking and location-guided screening features are of value in detecting and triaging abnormal smears.

摘要

目的

评估焦点定位引导筛查(FPGS)在巴氏染色宫颈阴道涂片计算机辅助初筛中的性能。

研究设计

共37306例常规连续传统巴氏涂片前瞻性地在FPGS上进行处理。仪器指定为需复查的每张涂片根据使用GS复查工作站获得的结果进行报告。随后,对所有涂片进行传统手工快速筛查,并比较报告的结果。

结果

最初提交至FPGS的涂片中,34004例(91.15%)符合扫描条件。在这些涂片中,系统将7399例(21.8%)分类为无需进一步复查,并将其余26605例(78.2%)列为需复查。在发现的418例细胞异常中,FPGS将409例分类为需复查,9例轻度病变分类在“无需进一步复查”组。总体而言,352例(86%)非典型鳞状细胞(ASC)+被列为高分五分位数,包括102例高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)或更严重病变中的96例(94%)。定位引导软件在自动选择的视野中识别出378例(92%)排名异常涂片中的细胞异常,对鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)的敏感性>95%。

结论

涂片排名和定位引导筛查功能在检测和分类异常涂片方面具有价值。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the FocalPoint GS system performance in an Italian population-based screening of cervical abnormalities.在意大利基于人群的宫颈异常筛查中对FocalPoint GS系统性能的评估。
Acta Cytol. 2007 Nov-Dec;51(6):865-71. doi: 10.1159/000325862.
2
A retrospective validation of the FocalPoint GS slide profiler NFR technology by analysis of interval disease outcomes compared with manual cytology.通过对比间隔性疾病结果分析,对 FocalPoint GS 玻片轮廓仪 NFR 技术进行回顾性验证,与人工细胞学检查相比。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2019 Apr;127(4):240-246. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22109. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
3
The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology. Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice.用于宫颈细胞学初筛的自动巴氏涂片系统。将一项前瞻性、预期用途研究的结果与常规手工操作结果进行比较。
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):214-20. doi: 10.1159/000331549.
4
A validation study of the FocalPoint GS imaging system for gynecologic cytology screening.用于妇科细胞学筛查的 FocalPoint GS 成像系统的验证研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Apr;121(4):189-96. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21271. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
5
A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.自动巴氏涂片系统定位引导筛查的可行性研究。
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(1):221-6. doi: 10.1159/000331550.
6
BD focalpoint slide profiler performance with atypical glandular cells on SurePath Papanicolaou smears.BD FocalPoint 幻灯片分析系统在巴氏涂片检查中对非典型腺细胞的检测性能。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2010 Apr 25;118(2):68-74. doi: 10.1002/cncy.20067.
7
[Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].[卫生技术评估报告:用于宫颈癌筛查的计算机辅助巴氏试验]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43.
8
Performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System in the detection of high-risk cases in cervicovaginal smears.
Acta Cytol. 2001 Sep-Oct;45(5):704-8. doi: 10.1159/000328291.
9
Morphologic analysis of false negative SurePath® slides using Focalpoint™ GS computer-assisted cervical screening technology: An Australian experience.使用Focalpoint™ GS计算机辅助宫颈筛查技术对SurePath®假阴性玻片进行形态学分析:澳大利亚的经验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Nov;43(11):870-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.23314. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Calibration of the Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS slide profiler is essential for optimal performance: Avoiding the algorithm supersaturation cascade effect pitfall.Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS 玻片扫描分析系统的校准对于实现最佳性能至关重要:避免算法过饱和级联效应的陷阱。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Jun;131(6):383-391. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22693. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Introduction, Screening and the Pathology of Cervical Dysplasia.宫颈癌的预防:德国妇产科学会和德国妇科肿瘤学会指南(S3级别,德国医学科学与医学质量评估研究所登记号015/027OL,2017年12月)——第1部分,包括引言、筛查及宫颈发育异常的病理学
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):148-159. doi: 10.1055/a-0818-5440. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
[Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology].[宫颈细胞学中的计算机辅助诊断]
Pathologe. 2011 Nov;32(6):476-83. doi: 10.1007/s00292-011-1477-4.
3
The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology.
数字成像在细胞病理学领域的影响。
Cytojournal. 2009 Mar 6;6:6. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.48606.