• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国民医疗服务体系乳腺筛查计划(2000 - 2005年)的结果。

Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000-05.

作者信息

Bennett R L, Blanks R G, Patnick J, Moss S M

机构信息

Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):200-4. doi: 10.1258/096914107782912068.

DOI:10.1258/096914107782912068
PMID:18078565
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present results from the UK NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) for the six-year period from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2005, and to compare these with targets.

METHODS

Data are collected annually from all UK screening units on standard KC62 return forms.

RESULTS

The prevalence of screen-positive cancer (cancer detection rate) has increased at both rounds during the six-year period. At the incident round, cancer detection rates increased by 24%, from 5.4 per 1000 in 2000 to 6.7 per 1000 in 2005 and the detection of small cancers (< or = 10 mm) has increased by 40%. Generally, quality measures in the programme continue to improve. However, while rates of recall at the incident screen decreased from 3.8% in 2000 to 3.6% in 2005, at the prevalent round, in 2005, 22% of units continued to recall more than 10% of women to assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the performance of the programme continues to improve. In the future, analysis of data on interval cancers will assist the interpretation of cancer detection rates.

摘要

目的

呈现1999年4月1日至2005年3月31日这六年期间英国国民健康服务体系乳腺筛查项目(NHSBSP)的结果,并将其与目标进行比较。

方法

每年从英国所有筛查单位收集标准KC62回执表格中的数据。

结果

在这六年期间的两轮筛查中,筛查呈阳性的癌症患病率(癌症检出率)均有所上升。在初筛轮次中,癌症检出率提高了24%,从2000年的每1000人5.4例增至2005年的每1000人6.7例,小癌症(≤10毫米)的检出率提高了40%。总体而言,该项目的质量指标持续改善。然而,虽然初筛时的召回率从2000年的3.8%降至2005年的3.6%,但在现患轮次中,2005年有22%的单位继续将超过10%的女性召回进行评估。

结论

结果表明该项目的表现持续改善。未来,对间期癌数据的分析将有助于解读癌症检出率。

相似文献

1
Results from the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme 2000-05.英国国民医疗服务体系乳腺筛查计划(2000 - 2005年)的结果。
J Med Screen. 2007;14(4):200-4. doi: 10.1258/096914107782912068.
2
The Scottish breast screening programme's experience of monitoring interval cancers.苏格兰乳房筛查项目对间期癌的监测经验。
J Med Screen. 1999;6(1):21-7. doi: 10.1136/jms.6.1.21.
3
Results from the UK NHS breast screening programme 1994-1999.1994 - 1999年英国国民健康服务体系乳房筛查项目的结果。
J Med Screen. 2000;7(4):195-8. doi: 10.1136/jms.7.4.195.
4
A comparison of two view and one view mammography in the detection of small invasive cancers: results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.两种视图与一种视图乳腺钼靶摄影术在检测小浸润性癌中的比较:来自国民保健服务乳腺筛查计划的结果。
J Med Screen. 1996;3(4):200-3. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300408.
5
Results from the NHS breast screening programme 1990-1993.1990 - 1993年英国国家医疗服务体系乳房筛查项目的结果。
J Med Screen. 1995;2(4):186-90. doi: 10.1177/096914139500200403.
6
Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.1991年4月至1997年3月哥本哈根乳腺癌的乳腺X线筛查。乳腺X线筛查评估小组。
APMIS Suppl. 1998;83:1-44.
7
A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺癌筛查项目中,针对单视图和双视图乳腺钼靶检查,按阅片者数量比较乳腺癌检出率:结果报告
J Med Screen. 1998;5(4):195-201. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.4.195.
8
Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目中的间期癌
Br J Cancer. 1999 Nov;81(5):912-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690786.
9
Use of two view mammography compared with one view in the detection of small invasive cancers: further results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.在检测小的浸润性癌方面,使用双视角乳腺钼靶摄影与单视角乳腺钼靶摄影的比较:英国国家医疗服务体系乳腺筛查项目的进一步结果
J Med Screen. 1997;4(2):98-101. doi: 10.1177/096914139700400206.
10
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.美国与英国乳腺钼靶筛查的比较。
JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and validating key performance indicators for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programs: a literature review and Delphi survey.制定和验证乳腺癌、宫颈癌及结直肠癌筛查项目的关键绩效指标:一项文献综述与德尔菲调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;13:1491226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491226. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and quality appraisal of a new English breast screening linked data set as part of the age, test threshold, and frequency of mammography screening (ATHENA-M) study.作为年龄、检测阈值和乳房 X 光筛查频率(ATHENA-M)研究的一部分,开发和质量评估新的英语乳房筛查链接数据集。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Jan 23;97(1153):98-112. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqad023.
3
Association of Menopausal Hormone Therapy With Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality During Long-term Follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials.
绝经激素治疗与妇女健康倡议随机临床试验长期随访中乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):369-380. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9482.
4
Invasive breast cancer over four decades reveals persisting poor metastatic outcomes in treatment resistant subgroup - the "ATRESS" phenomenon.四十余年来,侵袭性乳腺癌在治疗抵抗亚组中持续存在不良转移结局——“ATRESS”现象。
Breast. 2020 Apr;50:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Preliminary effectiveness of breast cancer screening among 1.22 million Chinese females and different cancer patterns between urban and rural women.中国 122 万女性乳腺癌筛查的初步效果及城乡女性不同的癌症发病模式。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 20;6:39459. doi: 10.1038/srep39459.
6
Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?北美乳房X光检查的假阳性率是否过高?
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160045. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160045. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Population-based screening for cancer: hope and hype.基于人群的癌症筛查:希望与炒作。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):550-65. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.50. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
8
Addressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example.应对评估医生层面筛查表现的挑战:以乳腺钼靶检查为例。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089418. eCollection 2014.
9
Prognostic value of survivin expression in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.生存素表达在乳腺癌患者中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Tumour Biol. 2013 Aug;34(4):2053-62. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0848-2. Epub 2013 May 21.
10
Construction of knowledge and perception of mammography in the UK.英国乳腺钼靶摄影的知识构建与认知
Ecancermedicalscience. 2008;2:98. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.98. Epub 2008 Sep 30.