文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

吸引合作伙伴开展评估工作:预防研究中心项目所采用的策略及经验教训

Engaging partners to initiate evaluation efforts: tactics used and lessons learned from the prevention research centers program.

作者信息

Wright Demia Sundra, Anderson Lynda A, Brownson Ross C, Gwaltney Margaret K, Scherer Jennifer, Cross Alan W, Goodman Robert M, Schwartz Randy, Sims Tom, White Carol R

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mailstop K-45, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A21. Epub 2007 Dec 15.


DOI:
PMID:18082010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2248792/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Prevention Research Centers (PRC) Program underwent a 2-year evaluation planning project using a participatory process that allowed perspectives from the national community of PRC partners to be expressed and reflected in a national logic model. CONTEXT: The PRC Program recognized the challenge in developing a feasible, useable, and relevant evaluation process for a large, diverse program. To address the challenge, participatory and utilization-focused evaluation models were used. METHODS: Four tactics guided the evaluation planning process: 1) assessing stakeholders' communication needs and existing communication mechanisms and infrastructure; 2) using existing mechanisms and establishing others as needed to inform, educate, and request feedback; 3) listening to and using feedback received; and 4) obtaining adequate resources and building flexibility into the project plan to support multifaceted mechanisms for data collection. CONSEQUENCES: Participatory methods resulted in buy-in from stakeholders and the development of a national logic model. Benefits included CDC's use of the logic model for program planning and development of a national evaluation protocol and increased expectations among PRC partners for involvement. Challenges included the time, effort, and investment of program resources required for the participatory approach and the identification of whom to engage and when to engage them for feedback on project decisions. INTERPRETATION: By using a participatory and utilization-focused model, program partners positively influenced how CDC developed an evaluation plan. The tactics we used can guide the involvement of program stakeholders and help with decisions on appropriate methods and approaches for engaging partners.

摘要

背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的预防研究中心(PRC)项目开展了一项为期两年的评估规划项目,采用了参与式流程,使PRC合作伙伴全国社区的观点得以表达,并反映在一个全国性的逻辑模型中。 背景情况:PRC项目认识到为一个庞大、多样的项目制定可行、可用且相关的评估流程面临挑战。为应对这一挑战,采用了以参与和利用为重点的评估模型。 方法:四项策略指导了评估规划过程:1)评估利益相关者的沟通需求以及现有的沟通机制和基础设施;2)利用现有机制,并根据需要建立其他机制,以提供信息、开展教育并征求反馈意见;3)倾听并利用收到的反馈意见;4)获取充足资源,并在项目计划中建立灵活性,以支持多方面的数据收集机制。 结果:参与式方法获得了利益相关者的认可,并促成了一个全国性逻辑模型的开发。好处包括CDC将逻辑模型用于项目规划和制定全国性评估方案,以及PRC合作伙伴对参与的期望增加。挑战包括参与式方法所需的时间、精力和项目资源投入,以及确定就项目决策征求反馈意见时应让哪些人参与以及何时让他们参与。 解读:通过使用以参与和利用为重点的模型,项目合作伙伴对CDC制定评估计划的方式产生了积极影响。我们使用的策略可以指导项目利益相关者的参与,并有助于就吸引合作伙伴的适当方法和途径做出决策。

相似文献

[1]
Engaging partners to initiate evaluation efforts: tactics used and lessons learned from the prevention research centers program.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008-1

[2]
Evaluating Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Interventions: Lessons Learned From CDC's Prevention Research Centers.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2015-10-15

[3]
Community engagement in Prevention Research: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Prevention Research Centers' National Community Committee.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009

[4]
The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations.

AIDS Educ Prev. 2002-6

[5]
The Prevention Research Centers Healthy Aging Research Network.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1

[6]
Lessons learned from the first year of implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's standardized evaluation system for HIV prevention programs.

AIDS Educ Prev. 2002-6

[7]
The evolution of the CDC HIV prevention capacity-building assistance initiative.

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007-1

[8]
Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1

[9]
Improving integration and coordination of funding, technical assistance, and reporting/data collection: recommendations from CDC and USAPI stakeholders.

Pac Health Dialog. 2011-3

[10]
National-level capacity-building assistance model to enhance HIV prevention for Asian & Pacific Islander communities.

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
The role of researchers in disseminating evidence to public health practice settings: a cross-sectional study.

Health Res Policy Syst. 2016-6-10

[2]
State-of-the-art and future directions in multilevel interventions across the cancer control continuum.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012-5

[3]
Reaiming RE-AIM: using the model to plan, implement, and evaluate the effects of environmental change approaches to enhancing population health.

Am J Public Health. 2010-9-23

[4]
Farmworkers at the border: a bilingual initiative for occupational health and safety.

Public Health Rep. 2009

本文引用的文献

[1]
Assessing prevention research impact: a bibliometric analysis.

Am J Prev Med. 2006-3

[2]
Using concept mapping to develop a logic model for the Prevention Research Centers Program.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1

[3]
Prevention Research Centers: contributions to updating the public health workforce through training.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2005-4

[4]
Health promotion and disease prevention research centers special interest projects competitive supplements. Notice.

Fed Regist. 2004-3-25

[5]
The value of engaging stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluations.

AIDS Educ Prev. 2002-6

[6]
Framework for program evaluation in public health.

MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999-9-17

[7]
Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

Annu Rev Public Health. 1998

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索