Wright Demia Sundra, Anderson Lynda A, Brownson Ross C, Gwaltney Margaret K, Scherer Jennifer, Cross Alan W, Goodman Robert M, Schwartz Randy, Sims Tom, White Carol R
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mailstop K-45, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A21. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Prevention Research Centers (PRC) Program underwent a 2-year evaluation planning project using a participatory process that allowed perspectives from the national community of PRC partners to be expressed and reflected in a national logic model. CONTEXT: The PRC Program recognized the challenge in developing a feasible, useable, and relevant evaluation process for a large, diverse program. To address the challenge, participatory and utilization-focused evaluation models were used. METHODS: Four tactics guided the evaluation planning process: 1) assessing stakeholders' communication needs and existing communication mechanisms and infrastructure; 2) using existing mechanisms and establishing others as needed to inform, educate, and request feedback; 3) listening to and using feedback received; and 4) obtaining adequate resources and building flexibility into the project plan to support multifaceted mechanisms for data collection. CONSEQUENCES: Participatory methods resulted in buy-in from stakeholders and the development of a national logic model. Benefits included CDC's use of the logic model for program planning and development of a national evaluation protocol and increased expectations among PRC partners for involvement. Challenges included the time, effort, and investment of program resources required for the participatory approach and the identification of whom to engage and when to engage them for feedback on project decisions. INTERPRETATION: By using a participatory and utilization-focused model, program partners positively influenced how CDC developed an evaluation plan. The tactics we used can guide the involvement of program stakeholders and help with decisions on appropriate methods and approaches for engaging partners.
背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的预防研究中心(PRC)项目开展了一项为期两年的评估规划项目,采用了参与式流程,使PRC合作伙伴全国社区的观点得以表达,并反映在一个全国性的逻辑模型中。 背景情况:PRC项目认识到为一个庞大、多样的项目制定可行、可用且相关的评估流程面临挑战。为应对这一挑战,采用了以参与和利用为重点的评估模型。 方法:四项策略指导了评估规划过程:1)评估利益相关者的沟通需求以及现有的沟通机制和基础设施;2)利用现有机制,并根据需要建立其他机制,以提供信息、开展教育并征求反馈意见;3)倾听并利用收到的反馈意见;4)获取充足资源,并在项目计划中建立灵活性,以支持多方面的数据收集机制。 结果:参与式方法获得了利益相关者的认可,并促成了一个全国性逻辑模型的开发。好处包括CDC将逻辑模型用于项目规划和制定全国性评估方案,以及PRC合作伙伴对参与的期望增加。挑战包括参与式方法所需的时间、精力和项目资源投入,以及确定就项目决策征求反馈意见时应让哪些人参与以及何时让他们参与。 解读:通过使用以参与和利用为重点的模型,项目合作伙伴对CDC制定评估计划的方式产生了积极影响。我们使用的策略可以指导项目利益相关者的参与,并有助于就吸引合作伙伴的适当方法和途径做出决策。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2002-6
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007-1
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007-1
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016-6-10
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012-5
Public Health Rep. 2009
Am J Prev Med. 2006-3
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006-1
AIDS Educ Prev. 2002-6
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999-9-17
Annu Rev Public Health. 1998