Kantarjian Hagop, O'Brien Susan, Shan Jianqin, Huang Xuelin, Garcia-Manero Guillermo, Faderl Stefan, Ravandi-Kashani Farhad, Verstovsek Srdan, Beth Rios Mary, Cortes Jorge
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):837-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23238.
Response rates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are now reported based on the cumulative incidence of a single-time best response. The study aim was to examine the significance of different response criteria for CML on imatinib therapy.
In all, 276 patients with chronic phase CML on imatinib therapy were analyzed. Cytogenetic and molecular responses were coded as to single best response and response at specific intervals of treatment.
The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CGCR) with imatinib was 91%; however, the incidence of CGCR at 48 months into therapy was only 78%. Similarly, the incidence of major molecular responses (best cumulative vs landmark at 48 months) were 74% versus 62%, and of undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts 38% versus 24%. There was a strong association between achievement of major cytogenetic response (Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positivity <or=35%) at 6 months to 12 months and survival as well as progression-free survival (PFS). Achievement of major molecular response (vs lesser molecular response) in patients in complete cytogenetic response was not associated with significant differences in survival, but showed some association with PFS. Durable CGCR and major molecular responses (documented continuously for >or=12 months) were associated with longer PFS duration but not with survival duration differences. Of interest, major molecular responses documented at least twice were noted in 71% of patients on imatinib therapy; undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts documented at least twice were noted in 34%.
Achievement and durability of CGCR and of major and complete molecular responses at landmark times predict outcome in CML, and may help in comparing the efficacy of different treatments.
目前慢性髓性白血病(CML)的缓解率是基于单次最佳缓解的累积发生率来报告的。本研究的目的是探讨不同的CML缓解标准对伊马替尼治疗的意义。
总共分析了276例接受伊马替尼治疗的慢性期CML患者。细胞遗传学和分子学缓解按照单次最佳缓解以及治疗特定时间点的缓解情况进行编码。
伊马替尼治疗的完全细胞遗传学缓解(CGCR)累积发生率为91%;然而,治疗48个月时的CGCR发生率仅为78%。同样,主要分子学缓解的发生率(最佳累积缓解与48个月时的标志性缓解)分别为74%和62%,BCR-ABL转录本不可检测的发生率分别为38%和24%。6个月至12个月时达到主要细胞遗传学缓解(费城染色体[Ph]阳性率≤35%)与生存率以及无进展生存期(PFS)之间存在强关联。完全细胞遗传学缓解的患者中达到主要分子学缓解(与较小分子学缓解相比)与生存率的显著差异无关,但与PFS存在一定关联。持久的CGCR和主要分子学缓解(持续记录≥12个月)与更长的PFS持续时间相关,但与生存持续时间差异无关。有趣的是,71%接受伊马替尼治疗的患者至少记录到两次主要分子学缓解;34%至少记录到两次BCR-ABL转录本不可检测。
标志性时间点的CGCR以及主要和完全分子学缓解的实现和持久性可预测CML的预后,并可能有助于比较不同治疗的疗效。