Suppr超能文献

饮食限制量表是中到长期饮食限制的有效测量方法吗?客观的生物学和行为学数据表明并非如此。

Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of moderate- to long-term dietary restriction? Objective biological and behavioral data suggest not.

作者信息

Stice Eric, Cooper Jamie A, Schoeller Dale A, Tappe Karyn, Lowe Michael R

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):449-58. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.449.

Abstract

Prospective studies indicate that elevated scores on dietary restraint scales predict bulimic symptom onset, but experiments indicate that assignment to dietary restriction interventions reduces bulimic symptoms. One possible explanation for the inconsistent findings is that the dietary restraint scales used in the former studies are not valid measures of dietary restriction. The authors previously found that dietary restraint scales were not inversely correlated with objective measures of short-term caloric intake (E. Stice, M. Fisher, & M. R. Lowe, 2004). In this follow-up report, 3 studies indicated that the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire dietary restraint scale was not correlated with doubly labeled water estimated energy intake over 2-week periods or with observationally measured caloric intake over 3 months. Results from this study and others suggest that dietary restraint scales may not be valid measures of moderate- to long-term dietary restriction and imply the need to reinterpret findings from studies that have used dietary restraint scales.

摘要

前瞻性研究表明,饮食抑制量表得分升高可预测贪食症状的出现,但实验表明,接受饮食限制干预可减轻贪食症状。对于这些不一致的研究结果,一种可能的解释是,先前研究中使用的饮食抑制量表并不能有效衡量饮食限制。作者此前发现,饮食抑制量表与短期热量摄入的客观测量指标并无负相关(E. 斯蒂斯、M. 费舍尔和M. R. 洛,2004年)。在这份后续报告中,三项研究表明,三因素饮食问卷中的饮食抑制量表与两周内用双标水法估算的能量摄入量,或与三个月内观察测量的热量摄入量均无关联。这项研究及其他研究的结果表明,饮食抑制量表可能无法有效衡量中长期的饮食限制,并意味着需要重新解读那些使用了饮食抑制量表的研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验