Prescrire Int. 2007 Dec;16(92):228-31.
(1) When type 2 diabetes is inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic therapy, one option is to add subcutaneous insulin injections (or to accept less stringent glycaemic control). However, since the effects of adding insulin have only been evaluated in the short-term, effects on long-term clinical outcomes remain unknown. (2) Exenatide, a drug belonging to a new pharmacological class (incretin analogues), is marketed as a subcutaneously administered adjunct to inadequately effective oral antidiabetic therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes. (3) Three placebo-controlled trials lasting 7 months showed that adding exenatide to metformin and/or a glucose-lowering sulphonylurea yielded an HbA1c level of 7% or less in about 40% of patients treated with exenatide 10 micrograms twice a day, versus about 10% of patients on placebo. The potential impact of exenatide on morbidity and mortality is not known. (4) In two trials versus insulin glargine and in one trial versus insulin aspart (+ isophane insulin), exenatide was as effective as the various insulins in controlling HbA1c levels. (5) During clinical trials, patients receiving exenatide lost an average of about 2 kg after 6 months, while insulin was associated with a weight gain of about 2 kg. (6) There was a similar incidence of hypoglycaemia with exenatide and insulin. In patients treated with exenatide, concomitant use of glucose-lowering sulphonylurea increases the risk of hypoglycaemia. (7) More than half of patients on exenatide experienced nausea, versus fewer than 10% of patients on insulin glargine. (8) The long-term consequences of the presence of antiexenatide antibodies on the effectiveness of treatment are not known. (9) Exenatide is administered in two subcutaneous injections a day, at fixed doses. Insulin is administered in one or several injections a day, at doses adjusted to self-monitored blood glucose levels. (10) Adding insulin rather than exenatide is a better option in general when oral antidiabetic therapy fails in patients with type 2 diabetes, as we have more experience with insulin and there is no evidence of important advantages with exenatide. The latter should be reserved for situations in which weight gain is a major problem.
(1) 当2型糖尿病经口服降糖治疗控制不佳时,一种选择是加用皮下胰岛素注射(或接受较宽松的血糖控制)。然而,由于加用胰岛素的效果仅在短期内进行了评估,其对长期临床结局的影响尚不清楚。(2) 艾塞那肽属于一类新药(肠促胰岛素类似物),作为2型糖尿病成年患者口服降糖治疗效果不佳时皮下注射的辅助药物上市。(3) 三项为期7个月的安慰剂对照试验表明,在二甲双胍和/或降糖磺脲类药物基础上加用艾塞那肽,对于每日两次注射10微克艾塞那肽的约40%患者,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平可降至7%或更低,而安慰剂组约为10%。艾塞那肽对发病率和死亡率的潜在影响尚不清楚。(4) 在两项与甘精胰岛素对比的试验以及一项与门冬胰岛素(+ 低精蛋白胰岛素)对比的试验中,艾塞那肽在控制HbA1c水平方面与各种胰岛素效果相当。(5) 在临床试验期间,接受艾塞那肽治疗的患者6个月后平均体重减轻约2千克,而胰岛素治疗则使体重增加约2千克。(6) 艾塞那肽和胰岛素导致低血糖的发生率相似。在接受艾塞那肽治疗的患者中,同时使用降糖磺脲类药物会增加低血糖风险。(7) 超过半数使用艾塞那肽的患者出现恶心,而使用甘精胰岛素的患者中出现恶心的不到10%。(8) 抗艾塞那肽抗体的存在对治疗效果的长期影响尚不清楚。(9) 艾塞那肽每日固定剂量皮下注射两次。胰岛素根据自我监测的血糖水平调整剂量,每日注射一次或几次。(10) 一般来说,当2型糖尿病患者口服降糖治疗失败时,加用胰岛素而非艾塞那肽是更好的选择,因为我们对胰岛素有更多经验,且没有证据表明艾塞那肽有重要优势。后者应保留用于体重增加是主要问题的情况。