Trevisin Michelle, Pollock Wendy, Dimech Wayne, Melny Joy, Paspaliaris Bill, Gillis David, Wong Richard, Savige Judy
Division of Laboratory Medicine, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jan;129(1):42-53. doi: 10.1309/F6L4C48RHFMT4AAU.
This study evaluated the performance of 12 assays for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in 55 active and 68 treated cases of vasculitis and in nonvasculitic disease. It examined within- and between-assay precision; binding curves, binding levels, and interassay consistency; and sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. All assays were highly sensitive for active vasculitis (median, 94%; range, 91%-96%), but sensitivities were more varied in treated disease (median, 69%; range, 57%-82%). Binding curves and binding levels were also very variable in PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA assays. This has implications for studies correlating ANCA levels with disease activity and in developing ANCA-based treatment guidelines. PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA assays need to be standardized as a matter of urgency, but in the meantime, individual laboratories must understand the limitations of the assays used, especially with low-level ANCA in treated vasculitis and nonvasculitic disease.
本研究评估了12种抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)检测方法针对蛋白酶3(PR3)和髓过氧化物酶(MPO)的性能,检测对象包括55例活动性血管炎病例、68例已接受治疗的血管炎病例以及非血管炎性疾病病例。研究考察了检测方法的批内和批间精密度;结合曲线、结合水平及检测方法间的一致性;以及敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征分析。所有检测方法对活动性血管炎均具有高度敏感性(中位数为94%;范围为91%-96%),但在已接受治疗的疾病中敏感性差异更大(中位数为69%;范围为57%-82%)。PR3-ANCA和MPO-ANCA检测方法的结合曲线和结合水平也存在很大差异。这对将ANCA水平与疾病活动度相关联的研究以及制定基于ANCA的治疗指南具有重要意义。PR3-ANCA和MPO-ANCA检测方法亟待标准化,但与此同时,各实验室必须了解所使用检测方法的局限性,尤其是在已接受治疗的血管炎和非血管炎性疾病中低水平ANCA的情况。