Suppr超能文献

心脏导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的术前用药:是否会增加血管穿刺部位并发症?

Premedication for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: does it increase vascular access site complications?

作者信息

Woodhead Jonele, Harding Scott A, Simmonds Mark, Dee Steven, McBride-Henry Karen

机构信息

Cardiac Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):466-71. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000297386.14002.f2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine whether premedication with oral diazepam (5-10 mg) before coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with an increase in access site related complications. We also aimed to determine the effect on patient's perception of anxiety and pain.

METHODS

A total of 760 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo either cardiac catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to either premedication with diazepam 5-10 mg 30 to 60 minutes prior to procedures (n = 379) or no premedication (n = 381). Administration of intravenous midazolam during the procedures was permitted and was at the operator's discretion. The primary end point of the study was a composite of hematoma (>or=3 cm), pseudoaneurysm (requiring surgical repair), arterial bleeding (requiring further compression), and vasovagal events. Secondary end points included the patient's perception of pain and anxiety (n = 144).

RESULTS

Hematomas (17% vs 15%, P = .41), pseudoaneurysm (0.3% vs 0%, P = .31), arterial bleeding (3.4% vs 4.2%, P = .58), vasovagals (4% vs 3%, P = .32), and the combined primary end point (25% vs 22%, P = .145) were similar in the premedication and no premedication groups. There was also no difference in the number of patients experiencing periprocedural anxiety (36% vs 37%, P = .862). However, those premedicated with diazepam were significantly less likely to report periprocedural pain (32% vs 53%, P = .0114).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with oral diazepam prior to cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention does not alter rates of access site complications or anxiety, but does reduce periprocedural pain.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定在冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前口服地西泮(5 - 10毫克)进行预处理是否会增加穿刺部位相关并发症的发生率。我们还旨在确定其对患者焦虑和疼痛感知的影响。

方法

共有760例计划进行心脏导管插入术或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的连续患者被随机分为两组,一组在手术前30至60分钟接受5 - 10毫克地西泮预处理(n = 379),另一组不进行预处理(n = 381)。手术过程中允许酌情使用静脉咪达唑仑。本研究的主要终点是血肿(≥3厘米)、假性动脉瘤(需要手术修复)、动脉出血(需要进一步压迫)和血管迷走神经事件的综合情况。次要终点包括患者对疼痛和焦虑的感知(n = 144)。

结果

预处理组和未预处理组在血肿(17%对15%,P = 0.41)、假性动脉瘤(0.3%对0%,P = 0.31)、动脉出血(3.4%对4.2%,P = 0.58)、血管迷走神经事件(4%对3%,P = 0.32)以及综合主要终点(25%对22%,P = 0.145)方面相似。围手术期焦虑患者的数量也没有差异(36%对37%,P = 0.862)。然而,接受地西泮预处理的患者报告围手术期疼痛的可能性显著降低(32%对53%,P = 0.0114)。

结论

在心脏导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前口服地西泮进行治疗不会改变穿刺部位并发症或焦虑的发生率,但会减轻围手术期疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验