Pollack Murray M
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
J Trauma. 2007 Dec;63(6 Suppl):S143-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815acd48.
Intensive care has been in the forefront of quality investigations. Outcomes researchers have taken advantage of reliable and robust methods to adjust for severity of illness and other case mix variables, and readily identifiable relevant outcomes (survival and death) to investigate quality factors associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. Current studies are limited by using databases of convenience, use of historical controls, small sample sizes, and inadequate case-mix adjustment. Only one study has focused on the comparative advantage of pediatric versus adult intensive care units for injured children; it demonstrated substantially improved risk-adjusted mortality rates. The effect of volume on quality of pediatric intensive care has been the subject of multiple evaluations, although each of these studies has serious limitations. Other studies have demonstrated that the experience of the bedside caregiver is important in patient outcomes.
重症监护一直处于质量调查的前沿。结果研究人员利用可靠且强大的方法来调整疾病严重程度和其他病例组合变量,并采用易于识别的相关结果(生存和死亡)来调查与改善风险调整后结果相关的质量因素。目前的研究受到使用便利数据库、采用历史对照、样本量小以及病例组合调整不足的限制。只有一项研究关注了儿科重症监护病房与成人重症监护病房对受伤儿童的比较优势;该研究表明风险调整后的死亡率有显著改善。尽管这些研究都存在严重局限性,但儿科重症监护的规模对质量的影响一直是多项评估的主题。其他研究表明床边护理人员的经验对患者的治疗结果很重要。