Suppr超能文献

一项关于5F与7F引导导管用于经股动脉经皮冠状动脉支架植入术的随机试验。

A randomized trial of 5 versus 7 French guiding catheters for transfemoral percutaneous coronary stent implantation.

作者信息

Büchler Jorge R, Ribeiro Expedito E, Falcão João L, Martinez Eulógio E, Büchler Rica D, Feres Fausto, Maielo José R, Haddad Nagib, Ramires José F, Ellis Stephen G

机构信息

Incor - The Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2008 Feb;21(1):50-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00315.x. Epub 2007 Dec 17.

Abstract

Comparative studies between 5 French guiding catheter and others of larger size using the transfemoral approach to coronary stenting have not been described. Coronary stent implantation was performed in 90 patients in a randomized trial. The primary end-point was to compare the incidence of successful uncomplicated stent implantation per lesion with the 5F and 7F guiding catheters. Patients were excluded for excessive vessel tortuosity or anticipated need for equipment not fitting through a 5 catheter. Baseline characteristics and the use of direct stenting did not differ between the two groups. The primary success rate was 97.8% per patient in both groups and 98% per lesion in the 5 French and 97.9% in the 7 French. Guiding catheter change was necessary in 1 patient in each group to successfully complete the procedure in both groups. The amount of contrast used was 63 +/- 27.3 mL in the 5 French and 76 +/- 25 mL in the 7 French groups (P < 0.05). Vascular complications and blood transfusions occurred somewhat more frequently in the 7 French group (P = 0.058). The manual compression time after sheath removal was 5.1 +/- 2.0 min and 8.0 +/- 4.3 min, respectively, in the 5 and 7 French groups (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the 5 French guiding catheters showed a similar success rate with coronary stenting when compared to the 7 French, but the amount of contrast used and manual compression time after sheath removal, as well as the rate of vascular and bleeding complications, were reduced in the 5 French group.

摘要

尚未有关于使用经股动脉途径进行冠状动脉支架置入时,5法国(5F)引导导管与其他较大尺寸引导导管的比较研究。在一项随机试验中,对90例患者进行了冠状动脉支架植入。主要终点是比较使用5F和7F引导导管时,每个病变成功且无并发症的支架植入发生率。因血管过度迂曲或预期需要不适合通过5F导管的设备而排除患者。两组之间的基线特征和直接支架置入的使用情况无差异。两组患者的主要成功率均为97.8%,5F组每个病变的成功率为98%,7F组为97.9%。每组各有1例患者需要更换引导导管才能成功完成手术。5F组使用的造影剂剂量为(63±27.3)mL,7F组为(76±25)mL(P<0.05)。7F组血管并发症和输血的发生频率略高(P=0.058)。5F组和7F组拔鞘后手动压迫时间分别为(5.1±2.0)分钟和(8.0±4.3)分钟(P<0.01)。总之,与7F引导导管相比,5F引导导管在冠状动脉支架置入时显示出相似的成功率,但5F组使用的造影剂剂量、拔鞘后手动压迫时间以及血管和出血并发症的发生率均降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验