Patel Nishant D, Nwakanma Lois U, Weiss Eric S, Williams Jason A, Conte John V
Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):135-45; discussion 145-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.101.
Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) is classically performed in heart failure patients with anteroseptal infarction. It is unknown how the extent of septal myocardial infarction (SMI) affects prognosis. We reviewed our experience to evaluate the impact of the extent of SMI on outcomes after SVR.
We retrospectively reviewed SVR patients from January 2002 to December 2005. Patients were stratified based on the extent of SMI assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings; SMI was graded as less than 50%, 50% to 74%, and 75% or greater of the length or height, or both, of the septum. Follow-up was 100%.
Seventy-eight patients underwent SVR. Twenty-eight patients had less than 50%, 30 patients had 50% to 74%, and 20 patients had 75% or greater involvement of the length or height, or both, of the septum. Patients with 75% or greater involvement had a significantly lower ejection fraction and larger left ventricular volumes preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging. All patients with 75% or greater involvement were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV preoperatively, and 50% (10 of 20) had significant mitral regurgitation requiring a concomitant mitral valve procedure. Operative mortality was similar between groups. Cardiac function improved and was similar among the three groups postoperatively. The PR intervals on electrocardiography were similar among the three groups, but did show trends toward longer duration for those with more extensive SMI. Preoperative mean QRS duration was significantly longer for patients with 75% or greater SMI. Three-year Kaplan-Meier survival was also similar among groups; 75% or greater involvement was not a predictor of mortality on Cox regression (odds ratio = 1.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.3 to 7.0; p = 0.6). Three quarters (15 of 20) of patients with 75% or greater involvement of the septum improved to NYHA class I/II at follow-up.
This study has evaluated the impact of the extent of SMI on SVR outcomes. These data demonstrate similar survival and significant functional and clinical improvement after SVR regardless of the extent of SMI.
外科心室修复术(SVR)传统上用于患有前间隔梗死的心力衰竭患者。目前尚不清楚间隔心肌梗死(SMI)的范围如何影响预后。我们回顾了我们的经验,以评估SMI范围对SVR术后结局的影响。
我们回顾性分析了2002年1月至2005年12月期间接受SVR的患者。根据磁共振成像和术中发现评估的SMI范围对患者进行分层;SMI根据间隔长度或高度或两者的比例分为小于50%、50%至74%以及75%或更高。随访率为100%。
78例患者接受了SVR。28例患者的SMI小于50%,30例患者为50%至74%,20例患者的间隔长度或高度或两者的受累比例为75%或更高。磁共振成像显示,受累比例为75%或更高的患者术前射血分数显著较低,左心室容积较大。所有受累比例为75%或更高的患者术前均为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III/IV级,50%(20例中的10例)有严重二尖瓣反流,需要同时进行二尖瓣手术。各组间手术死亡率相似。术后三组心脏功能均有改善且相似。三组心电图的PR间期相似,但SMI范围更广的患者PR间期有延长趋势。SMI为75%或更高的患者术前平均QRS时限显著更长。三组的三年Kaplan-Meier生存率也相似;在Cox回归分析中,75%或更高的受累比例不是死亡率的预测因素(比值比=1.4;95%置信区间:0.3至7.0;p=0.6)。随访时,四分之三(20例中的15例)间隔受累比例为75%或更高的患者改善为NYHA I/II级。
本研究评估了SMI范围对SVR结局的影响。这些数据表明,无论SMI范围如何,SVR术后生存率相似,且功能和临床均有显著改善。