Wolff Brandy, Burns John W, Quartana Phillip J, Lofland Kenneth, Bruehl Stephen, Chung Ok Y
Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
J Behav Med. 2008 Apr;31(2):105-14. doi: 10.1007/s10865-007-9138-z.
Catastrophizing about pain is related to elevated pain severity and poor adjustment among chronic pain patients, but few physiological mechanisms by which pain catastrophizing maintains and exacerbates pain have been explored. We hypothesized that resting levels of lower paraspinal muscle tension and/or lower paraspinal and cardiovascular reactivity to emotional arousal may: (a) mediate links between pain catastrophizing and chronic pain intensity; (b) moderate these links such that only patients described by certain combinations of pain catastrophizing and physiological indexes would report pronounced chronic pain. Chronic low back pain patients (N = 97) participated in anger recall and sadness recall interviews while lower paraspinal and trapezius EMG and systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded. Mediation models were not supported. However, pain catastrophizing significantly interacted with resting lower paraspinal muscle tension to predict pain severity such that high catastrophizers with high resting lower paraspinal tension reported the greatest pain. Pain catastrophizing also interacted with SBP, DBP and HR reactivity to affect pain such that high catastrophizers who showed low cardiovascular reactivity to the interviews reported the greatest pain. Results support a multi-variable profile approach to identifying pain catastrophizers at greatest risk for pain severity by virtue of resting muscle tension and cardiovascular stress function.
对疼痛灾难化的认知与慢性疼痛患者疼痛严重程度的升高及适应不良有关,但疼痛灾难化维持和加剧疼痛的生理机制鲜有研究。我们假设,脊柱旁肌肉静息张力水平较低和/或脊柱旁及心血管系统对情绪唤起的反应性较低可能:(a)介导疼痛灾难化与慢性疼痛强度之间的联系;(b)调节这些联系,使得只有那些在疼痛灾难化和生理指标方面有特定组合的患者才会报告明显的慢性疼痛。慢性下背痛患者(N = 97)参与了愤怒回忆和悲伤回忆访谈,同时记录脊柱旁和斜方肌的肌电图以及收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和心率(HR)。中介模型未得到支持。然而,疼痛灾难化与脊柱旁肌肉静息张力显著相互作用,以预测疼痛严重程度,即脊柱旁静息张力高且灾难化认知程度高的患者报告的疼痛最为严重。疼痛灾难化还与SBP、DBP和HR反应性相互作用,影响疼痛程度,即对访谈表现出低心血管反应性的高灾难化认知患者报告的疼痛最为严重。研究结果支持一种多变量概况方法,即通过静息肌肉张力和心血管应激功能来识别疼痛严重程度风险最高的疼痛灾难化认知患者。