Zwahlen Daniel R, Martin Jarad M, Millar Jeremy L, Schneider Uwe
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.007. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
To estimate and compare the secondary cancer risk (SCR) due to para-aortic (PA), dogleg field (DLF), or extensive field (EF) radiotherapy (RT) at different dose levels for Stage I testicular seminoma.
The organ equivalent dose concept with a linear, plateau, and linear-exponential dose-response model was applied to the dose distributions to estimate the SCR. The dose distributions were calculated in a voxel-based anthropomorphic phantom. Three different three-dimensional plans were computed: PA, DLF, and EF. The plans were calculated with 6-MV photons and two opposed fields, using 20 Gy in 10 fractions.
The estimated cumulative SCR for a 75-year-old patient treated with PA-RT at age 35 was 23.3% (linear model), 20.9% (plateau model), and 20.8% (linear-exponential model) compared with 19.8% for the general population. Dependent on the model, PA-RT compared with DLF-RT reduced the SCR by 48-63% or 64-69% when normalized to EF-RT. For PA-RT, the linear dose-response model predicted a decrease of 45% in the SCR, using 20 Gy instead of 30 Gy; the linear-exponential dose-response model predicted no change in SCR.
Our model suggested that the SCR after PA-RT for Stage I testicular seminoma is reduced by approximately one-half to two-thirds compared with DLF-RT, independent of the dose-response model. The SCR is expected to be equal or lower with 20 Gy than with 30 Gy. In the absence of mature patient data, the organ equivalent dose concept offers the best potential method of estimating the SCR when discussing treatment options with patients.
评估并比较针对Ⅰ期睾丸精原细胞瘤在不同剂量水平下,腹主动脉旁(PA)、狗腿野(DLF)或扩大野(EF)放疗(RT)导致的继发癌症风险(SCR)。
将具有线性、平台型和线性-指数型剂量反应模型的器官等效剂量概念应用于剂量分布,以估计SCR。剂量分布在基于体素的人体模型中计算。计算了三种不同的三维计划:PA、DLF和EF。这些计划使用6兆伏光子和两个对穿野计算,分10次给予20 Gy。
一名35岁接受PA-RT治疗的75岁患者,估计的累积SCR在(线性模型下)为23.3%,(平台型模型下)为20.9%,(线性-指数型模型下)为20.8%,而普通人群为19.8%。取决于模型,与DLF-RT相比,PA-RT归一化至EF-RT时SCR降低了48%-63%或64%-69%。对于PA-RT,线性剂量反应模型预测使用20 Gy而非30 Gy时SCR降低45%;线性-指数型剂量反应模型预测SCR无变化。
我们的模型表明,对于Ⅰ期睾丸精原细胞瘤,PA-RT后的SCR与DLF-RT相比降低了约二分之一至三分之二,与剂量反应模型无关。预计20 Gy时的SCR等于或低于30 Gy时的SCR。在缺乏成熟患者数据的情况下,在与患者讨论治疗方案时,器官等效剂量概念提供了估计SCR的最佳潜在方法。