Csorba János, Vados Marianna, Zsadon Anna, Szélesné Edit Ferenc, Páli Eszter, Horváth Agnes, Bóna Adrienn, Dinya Elek
ELTE Barczi Gusztav Gyogypedagogiai Foiskolai Kar, Gyogypedagogiai-Kortani Tanszek, Budapest, Hungary.
Psychiatr Hung. 2007;22(3):191-9.
The evaluation of dysfunctional attitudes and coping mechanisms to identify specific characteristics of certain psychiatric diseases is an important research objective also in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry.
Authors compared dysfunctional attitudes and coping strategies of various monodiagnostic groups recruited from a sample of 158 adolescent outpatients (54 males, mean age 16.0 SD 1.16 and 104 females, mean age 15.9 SD 1.11) suffering from major depression (n=35), dysthymia (n=20), social phobia (n=11), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD n=12), conduct disorder (n=15) and adjustment disorder (n=65). The questionnaires and tests used in the study were the shortened standard Hungarian version a) of Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS, Burns 1980) and b) of Ways of Coping Checklist (Folkmann et al 1986). Patients were collected from the 5-county, representative, cross-sectional pool of "Pannonia" Transdanubian Adolescent Psychiatric Survey. Diagnoses were confirmed by the M.I.N.I. International Neuropsychiatric Diagnostic Interview, Hungarian version, and patients with comorbid diagnoses were excluded from the study.
Contrary to expectations, the patient samples differed from one another significantly only in a few test items, but all the differences that had been found were as expected between the internalizing (overcontrolled) and externalizing (undercontrolled) disorder domains. The MD group had a significantly higher score in achievement scale than those in the group of adjustment disorder (behavioural subtype). Dysthymic adolescents had a significantly higher level of support seeking than the patients suffering from conduct disorder. The variation seen in some parameters (autonomy and passive coping scales) of two samples of the internalizing disorder group and of externalizing one (behaviour disorder and adjustment disorder samples) was probably due to the differences among groups in the ratio of sex.
Coping tests used in adult psychological studies are useful and confirm the occurrence of some typical mechanisms in adolescence too, but there exist strong need for more specific methods to identify adolescent coping qualities.
评估功能失调性态度和应对机制以确定某些精神疾病的特定特征,这在儿童和青少年精神病学领域也是一个重要的研究目标。
作者比较了从158名青少年门诊患者样本(54名男性,平均年龄16.0,标准差1.16;104名女性,平均年龄15.9,标准差1.11)中招募的不同单一诊断组的功能失调性态度和应对策略,这些患者患有重度抑郁症(n = 35)、心境恶劣障碍(n = 20)、社交恐惧症(n = 11)、广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD,n = 12)、品行障碍(n = 15)和适应障碍(n = 65)。研究中使用的问卷和测试是功能失调性态度量表(DAS,Burns 1980)和应对方式清单(Folkmann等人,1986)的匈牙利语缩短标准版。患者来自“潘诺尼亚”多瑙河以西青少年精神病学调查的5个县代表性横断面样本库。诊断由匈牙利语版的M.I.N.I.国际神经精神病学诊断访谈确认,患有共病诊断的患者被排除在研究之外。
与预期相反,患者样本仅在少数测试项目上存在显著差异,但所有已发现的差异正如内化(过度控制)和外化(控制不足)障碍领域之间预期的那样。重度抑郁症组在成就量表上的得分显著高于适应障碍组(行为亚型)。心境恶劣的青少年比患有品行障碍的患者寻求支持的水平显著更高。内化障碍组和外化障碍组(行为障碍和适应障碍样本)的两个样本在一些参数(自主性和被动应对量表)上的差异可能是由于各组性别比例的差异。
成人心理学研究中使用的应对测试是有用的,也证实了青春期一些典型机制的存在,但迫切需要更具体的方法来识别青少年的应对特质。