Türedi Süleyman, Hasanbasoglu Altug, Gunduz Abdulkadir, Yandi Mustafa
Department of Emergency Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
J Emerg Med. 2008 Apr;34(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.05.055. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
Previous studies have presented conflicting results regarding the predictive value of various clinical symptoms and signs for performing computed tomography (CT) scan in minor head injury. Moreover, despite the presence in the literature of several similar publications regarding whether or not CT should be employed at the time of presentation of minor head injured patients, data regarding delayed CT are limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether high-risk criteria represent a significant indication for initial CT scan in patients with minor head trauma, and whether or not analysis using delayed CT scan is necessary in patients with high-risk criteria before being discharged. Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with minor head trauma between September 1, 2003 and September 1, 2004 were evaluated prospectively. After being divided into two main groups, low- and high-risk, four separate sub-groups based on age were established. Initial spiral CT examination was done within 3 h of trauma on all patients in addition to a delayed control CT scan in those with high-risk criteria between 16 and 24 h after trauma. The difference between the high- and low-risk groups in terms of abnormal CT findings was statistically significant (p < 0.0005). Among high-risk patients there was a significant difference between patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 or 14 and those with a GCS score of 15 (p < 0.0005). The relationship between vomiting and abnormal CT scan was significant (odds ratio 4.61, 95% confidence interval 2.20-9.64, p = 0.0001), and the relationship between abnormal CT scan and suspected skull fracture was also significant (odds ratio 3.46, 95% confidence interval 1.52-7.91, p = 0.0032). No significant correlations between other high-risk criteria and abnormal CT scan were determined. The difference between initial and delayed CT scans in patients with high-risk criteria was not significant (p = 0.161). Low-risk patients with a GCS score of 15 may be discharged without initial CT scan being performed. Initial CT scan absolutely must be performed, however, on patients with GCS < or = 15 in the event of vomiting or suspected skull fracture, even if isolated. Even though the difference between initial and delayed CT scans in patients with high-risk criteria is not significant, it is our opinion that it is still prudent for delayed CT scan to be performed, particularly on patients whose GCS score does not rise to 15, or decreases.
以往的研究对于各种临床症状和体征在轻微头部损伤患者中进行计算机断层扫描(CT)的预测价值给出了相互矛盾的结果。此外,尽管文献中有几篇关于在轻微头部受伤患者就诊时是否应进行CT检查的类似出版物,但关于延迟CT的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定高危标准是否是轻微头部创伤患者进行初始CT扫描的重要指征,以及在出院前对有高危标准的患者进行延迟CT扫描分析是否必要。对2003年9月1日至2004年9月1日期间因轻微头部创伤就诊于急诊科的患者进行前瞻性评估。分为低风险和高风险两个主要组后,根据年龄建立了四个独立的亚组。所有患者在创伤后3小时内进行初始螺旋CT检查,对有高危标准的患者在创伤后16至24小时进行延迟对照CT扫描。高危组和低风险组在CT异常表现方面的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0005)。在高危患者中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为13或14的患者与评分为15的患者之间存在显著差异(p<0.0005)。呕吐与CT扫描异常之间的关系显著(优势比4.61,95%置信区间2.20-9.64,p=0.0001),CT扫描异常与疑似颅骨骨折之间的关系也显著(优势比3.46,95%置信区间1.52-7.91,p=0.0032)。未确定其他高危标准与CT扫描异常之间的显著相关性。有高危标准的患者初始CT扫描与延迟CT扫描之间的差异不显著(p=0.161)。GCS评分为15的低风险患者在未进行初始CT扫描的情况下可以出院。然而,对于GCS≤15且有呕吐或疑似颅骨骨折(即使是孤立情况)的患者,绝对必须进行初始CT扫描。尽管有高危标准的患者初始CT扫描与延迟CT扫描之间的差异不显著,但我们认为进行延迟CT扫描仍然是谨慎的做法,特别是对于GCS评分未升至15或降低的患者。