Lawhorne Larry W, Ouslander Joseph G, Parmelee Patricia A, Resnick Barbara, Calabrese Barbara
Department of Geriatrics, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45408, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008 Jan;9(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.08.003.
Urinary incontinence (UI) is common but inadequately assessed and treated in nursing facility (NF) residents. The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to determine perceptions about the importance of UI and its management in the NF setting compared with other geriatric syndromes and (2) to compare barriers to UI care as perceived by physicians, geriatric nurse practitioners (GNPs), directors of nursing and other nurses in administrative positions (DONs), and nursing assistants (NAs).
Computer-based surveys of physicians and DONs and a hard copy survey of NAs at their national meetings; an online survey of GNPs.
Responses included 395 physicians (31% response rate), 152 DONs (34%), 118 GNPs (23%), and 277 NAs (60%). Physicians, GNPs, and DONs evaluated and managed UI significantly less often than 5 other geriatric syndromes (behavioral symptoms of dementia, falls, unintended weight loss, pain, and delirium). In contrast, NAs were more likely to be involved in UI care than in care provided for residents with any of the other 5 syndromes. All 4 groups agreed that UI has less effect on clinical outcomes than the other 5 syndromes. However, DONs rated UI first with respect to cost of care; NAs third behind falls and pain; and physicians and GNPs rated UI fourth behind falls, behavioral symptoms, and delirium. With respect to quality of life effects, physicians and GNPs rated UI fifth and fourth respectively and DONs fourth. In contrast, NAs rated UI second only to pain with respect to its effect on quality of life. Perceived barriers differ among the 4 groups with physicians relatively more concerned that drug treatment alone is ineffective (P = .002); GNPs relatively more concerned with lack of effective nondrug interventions (P = .001); and DONs relatively more concerned about sufficient time to assess and manage UI (P = .001). NA respondents rated concern about anticholinergic drug effects lower than did respondents in the other 3 groups (P = .001).
Physicians, GNPs, and DONs are more likely to be involved in evaluating and managing behavioral symptoms of dementia, pain, falls, delirium, and unintended weight loss than UI in the NF setting. This leaves NAs as first-line managers for a condition that they perceive to have an important impact on quality of life. Perceived barriers to improving UI care differ among the 4 groups suggesting that approaches to overcoming the barriers should be multi-faceted.
尿失禁(UI)在护理机构(NF)居民中很常见,但评估和治疗不足。本研究的目的有两个:(1)确定与其他老年综合征相比,在NF环境中对UI及其管理重要性的看法;(2)比较医生、老年护理从业者(GNP)、护理主任(DON)和其他担任行政职务的护士以及护理助理(NA)所认为的UI护理障碍。
在全国会议上对医生和DON进行基于计算机的调查,对NA进行纸质调查;对GNP进行在线调查。
回复包括395名医生(回复率31%)、152名DON(34%)、118名GNP(23%)和277名NA(60%)。与其他5种老年综合征(痴呆的行为症状、跌倒、非故意体重减轻、疼痛和谵妄)相比,医生、GNP和DON评估和管理UI的频率明显更低。相比之下,NA参与UI护理的可能性高于参与其他5种综合征中任何一种综合征患者的护理。所有4组都认为UI对临床结局的影响小于其他5种综合征。然而,DON在护理成本方面将UI列为首位;NA将其列为第三,排在跌倒和疼痛之后;医生和GNP将其列为第四,排在跌倒、行为症状和谵妄之后。在生活质量影响方面,医生和GNP分别将UI列为第五和第四,DON列为第四。相比之下,NA认为UI对生活质量的影响仅次于疼痛,列为第二。4组所认为 的障碍有所不同,医生相对更担心仅药物治疗无效(P = .002);GNP相对更担心缺乏有效的非药物干预措施(P = .001);DON相对更担心没有足够时间评估和管理UI(P = .001)。NA受访者对抗胆碱能药物作用的担忧低于其他3组受访者(P = .001)。
在NF环境中,医生、GNP和DON更有可能参与评估和管理痴呆 的行为症状、疼痛、跌倒、谵妄和非故意体重减轻,而非UI。这使得NA成为他们认为对生活质量有重要影响的这种情况的一线管理者。4组所认为的改善UI护理的障碍有所不同,这表明克服这些障碍的方法应该是多方面的。