Durairaj Lakshmi, Schmidt Gregory A
Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Critical Care, and Occupational Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Chest. 2008 Jan;133(1):252-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1496.
Fluid infusion may be lifesaving in patients with severe sepsis, especially in the earliest phases of treatment. Following initial resuscitation, however, fluid boluses often fail to augment perfusion and may be harmful. In this review, we seek to compare and contrast the impact of fluids in early and later sepsis; show that much fluid therapy is clinically ineffective in patients with severe sepsis; explore the detrimental aspects of excessive volume infusion; examine how clinicians assess the intravascular volume state; appraise the potential for dynamic indexes to predict fluid responsiveness; and recommend a clinical approach.
液体输注对于严重脓毒症患者可能是救命的,尤其是在治疗的最初阶段。然而,在初始复苏后,液体冲击疗法往往无法增加灌注,甚至可能有害。在这篇综述中,我们旨在比较和对比液体在脓毒症早期和晚期的影响;表明大量液体疗法在严重脓毒症患者中临床上是无效的;探讨过量液体输注的有害方面;研究临床医生如何评估血管内容量状态;评估动态指标预测液体反应性的潜力;并推荐一种临床方法。