Baker Danial E
College of Pharmacy, Washington State University Spokane, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2007 Fall;7(4):214-22.
Lubiprostone offers an additional alternative for patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. Lubiprostone is more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, lubiprostone therapy was generally well tolerated and was not associated with severe adverse effects; however, the high incidence of nausea may be problematic for some patients. The nausea may be alleviated or minimized by administering the dose with food, and some patients may require a dosage reduction to 24 mug once daily. The key limitations of the placebo-controlled clinical trials include the absence of information regarding the duration of the constipation and previous types of therapies that had been used to treat the constipation and the absence of an active control group. Comparative studies with other therapies (eg, saline laxatives, polyethylene glycol) used for constipation are necessary to determine the clinical and economic value of this agent relative to other forms of therapy.
鲁比前列酮为慢性特发性便秘患者提供了另一种治疗选择。鲁比前列酮在治疗慢性特发性便秘方面比安慰剂更有效。在安慰剂对照的临床试验中,鲁比前列酮治疗一般耐受性良好,且未出现严重不良反应;然而,恶心的高发生率可能对一些患者来说是个问题。通过与食物一起给药可能会减轻或减少恶心,一些患者可能需要将剂量减至每日24微克。安慰剂对照临床试验的主要局限性包括缺乏关于便秘持续时间以及先前用于治疗便秘的治疗类型的信息,并且没有设立活性对照组。有必要开展与用于便秘治疗的其他疗法(如盐类泻药、聚乙二醇)的对比研究,以确定该药物相对于其他治疗形式的临床和经济价值。