Huang Chien-Fu, Fang Chih-Yuan, Ko Sheung-Fat, Chien Shao-Ju, Lin I-Chun, Lin Ying-Jui, Wang Chih-Hsien, Liang Chi-Di
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2007 Dec;106(12):986-91. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60073-X.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASD) with superior-anterior (SA) rim deficiency using Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO).
Between June 2003 and March 2007, 84 patients with secundum type ASD attempted transcatheter insertion of ASO in our institution. According to the transesophageal echocardiographic findings, patients were divided into two groups: group A, with deficient SA rim (< 3 mm); group B, with sufficient SA rim (> or = 3 mm). There were 43 children and 41 adults (age range, 2.0-79.4 years; mean age, 22.0 +/- 20.2 years). The failure rate, complications and the presence of residual shunt were compared between the two groups.
There were 34 patients in group A and 50 patients in group B. Failure of ASO implantation occurred in six patients, three in each group. One patient had two ASOs implanted for two separate ASDs. Therefore, the study cohort consisted of 78 patients with 79 ASO placed. Among 78 patients with successful implantation, five (6.4%) had persistent small residual shunt during follow-up (range, 1-46 months; mean, 21.6 +/- 12.0 months). There was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B in the procedures failure rate (p = 0.682), complications (p = 1.0) and the presence of residual shunt (p = 0.381) during the follow-up period.
ASD with deficient SA rim is a common variation. Similar to ASD with sufficient rims, transcatheter closure of secundum type ASD is also effective for ASD with SA rim deficiency.
背景/目的:使用Amplatzer房间隔封堵器(ASO)评估经导管封堵上腔-前位(SA)边缘缺损的房间隔缺损(ASD)的结果。
2003年6月至2007年3月期间,84例继发孔型ASD患者在我院尝试经导管插入ASO。根据经食管超声心动图检查结果,患者分为两组:A组,SA边缘缺损(<3mm);B组,SA边缘充足(≥3mm)。共有43名儿童和41名成人(年龄范围2.0 - 79.4岁;平均年龄22.0±20.2岁)。比较两组之间的失败率、并发症和残余分流情况。
A组有34例患者,B组有50例患者。ASO植入失败发生在6例患者中,每组各3例。1例患者因两个独立的ASD植入了两个ASO。因此,研究队列包括78例患者,共植入79个ASO。在78例成功植入的患者中,5例(6.4%)在随访期间(范围1 - 46个月;平均21.6±12.0个月)存在持续性小残余分流。随访期间,A组和B组在手术失败率(p = 0.682)、并发症(p = 1.0)和残余分流情况(p = 0.381)方面无统计学显著差异。
SA边缘缺损的ASD是一种常见变异。与边缘充足的ASD类似,经导管封堵继发孔型ASD对SA边缘缺损的ASD也有效。