Islam Shofiq, Loewenthal Mark R, Hoffman Gary R
University College Cork, School of Medicine, Cork, Ireland.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb;66(2):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.681.
The most common short-term method for the delivery of parenteral antimicrobial therapy in an acute hospitalized patient has traditionally been via a short peripherally inserted intravenous cannula. This approach, however, has significant limitations, particularly in patients who require prolonged, uninterrupted intravenous access. In this article, we report on our experience with an alternative method used to establish and maintain medium- to long-term intravenous access utilizing a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) to treat patients presenting with aggressive or recalcitrant maxillofacial head and neck infections.
We undertook a retrospective review of the medical records of 100 consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary referral teaching hospital, during the period February 2006 to February 2007, with a primary diagnosis of infection in the oral and maxillofacial region. We identified 6 patients in whom a PICC was used in the treatment of the condition. We also analyzed data obtained from an audit conducted by our infectious diseases unit. This audit recorded the outcome of 849 nurse-placed PICCs in the department's ambulatory intravenous therapy service. Using this data, we also performed a PICC line survival analysis and in so doing, calculated the complication rates.
In our series, the delivery of PICC-based therapy accounted for 6% of the treatment provided for all cases of maxillofacial sepsis. This included 3 cases of actinomycosis, 2 cases of odontogenic osteomyelitis, and 1 case of a zoonotic facial abscess/cellulitis. In this series of patients, catheters remained in situ for an average of 33 days (range 12-42 days). The audit data demonstrated that more than 75% of nurse-placed PICCs are functional without complication at 60 days. The most common complication was phlebitis (1 per 1,000 catheter days). Infection was rare (0.2 per 1,000 catheter days).
PICC is a safe and most reliable means of administering medium- to long-term intravenous antibiotics. We feel PICC-based therapy should be considered in the management of select patients with aggressive or recalcitrant maxillofacial head and neck sepsis.
在急性住院患者中,传统上最常用的肠外抗菌治疗短期给药方法是通过短外周静脉留置导管。然而,这种方法有显著局限性,尤其是在需要长期、不间断静脉通路的患者中。在本文中,我们报告了一种替代方法的使用经验,该方法利用外周中心静脉导管(PICC)建立和维持中长期静脉通路,以治疗侵袭性或顽固性颌面头颈部感染患者。
我们对2006年2月至2007年2月期间在一家三级转诊教学医院连续收治的100例主要诊断为口腔颌面部感染的患者的病历进行了回顾性研究。我们确定了6例使用PICC治疗该疾病的患者。我们还分析了从我们传染病科进行的一项审计中获得的数据。该审计记录了该科室门诊静脉治疗服务中849例由护士放置的PICC的结果。利用这些数据,我们还进行了PICC导管生存分析,并计算了并发症发生率。
在我们的系列研究中,基于PICC的治疗占所有颌面败血症病例治疗的6%。这包括3例放线菌病、2例牙源性骨髓炎和1例人畜共患面部脓肿/蜂窝织炎。在这组患者中,导管平均留置33天(范围12 - 42天)。审计数据表明,超过75%的由护士放置的PICC在60天时功能正常且无并发症。最常见的并发症是静脉炎(每1000导管日1例)。感染很少见(每1000导管日0.2例)。
PICC是一种安全且最可靠的中长期静脉抗生素给药方式。我们认为,在治疗某些侵袭性或顽固性颌面头颈部败血症患者时,应考虑基于PICC的治疗方法。