Steinmann Katharina, Kluwe Lan, Cooper David N, Brems Hilde, De Raedt Thomas, Legius Eric, Mautner Viktor-Felix, Kehrer-Sawatzki Hildegard
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 May;16(5):572-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5202002. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Gross deletions of the NF1 gene at 17q11.2 belong to the group of 'genomic disorders' characterized by local sequence architecture that predisposes to genomic rearrangements. Segmental duplications within regions associated with genomic disorders are prone to non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), which mediates gross rearrangements. Copy number variants (CNVs) without obvious phenotypic consequences also occur frequently in regions of genomic disorders. In the NF1 gene region, putative CNVs have been reportedly detected by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). These variants include duplications and deletions within the NF1 gene itself (CNV1) and a duplication that encompasses the SUZ12 gene, the distal NF1-REPc repeat and the RHOT1 gene (CNV2). To explore the possibility that these CNVs could have played a role in promoting deletion mutagenesis in type-1 deletions (the most common type of gross NF1 deletion), non-affected transmitting parents of patients with type-1 NF1 deletions were investigated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). However, neither CNV1 nor CNV2 were detected. This would appear to exclude these variants as frequent mediators of NAHR giving rise to type-1 deletions. Using MLPA, we were also unable to confirm CNV1 in healthy controls as previously reported. We conclude that locus-specific techniques should be used to independently confirm putative CNVs, originally detected by array CGH, to avoid false-positive results. In one patient with an atypical deletion, a duplication in the region of CNV2 was noted. This duplication could have occurred concomitantly with the deletion as part of a complex rearrangement or may alternatively have preceded the deletion.
17q11.2处NF1基因的大片段缺失属于“基因组疾病”组,其特征在于局部序列结构易导致基因组重排。与基因组疾病相关区域内的节段性重复易于发生非等位基因同源重组(NAHR),后者介导大片段重排。在基因组疾病区域也经常出现无明显表型后果的拷贝数变异(CNV)。在NF1基因区域,据报道通过阵列比较基因组杂交(阵列CGH)检测到了推定的CNV。这些变异包括NF1基因本身的重复和缺失(CNV1)以及包含SUZ12基因、远端NF1-REPc重复序列和RHOT1基因的重复(CNV)。为了探究这些CNV是否可能在促进1型缺失(NF1最常见的大片段缺失类型)的缺失诱变中发挥作用,通过多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)对1型NF1缺失患者未受影响的传递亲本进行了研究。然而,未检测到CNV1和CNV2。这似乎排除了这些变异作为导致1型缺失的NAHR常见介导因素的可能性。使用MLPA,我们也无法像先前报道的那样在健康对照中确认CNV1。我们得出结论,应使用位点特异性技术独立确认最初通过阵列CGH检测到的推定CNV,以避免假阳性结果。在一名患有非典型缺失的患者中,注意到CNV2区域存在重复。这种重复可能作为复杂重排的一部分与缺失同时发生,或者也可能在缺失之前发生。