Sirový M, Carda M
Chirurgická klinika Krajské nemocnice Pardubice.
Rozhl Chir. 2007 Nov;86(11):594-9.
The authors assess and compare results of percutaneous and open repair of closed Achilles tendon rupture
The authors retrospectively examined 115 patients with subcutaneous Achilles tendon rupture who were treated in the Regional Hospital of Pardubice during the years 2000-2005. They used the 100 point Hannover Achilles Tendon Score. 42 patients were operated on exclusively with percutaneous technique and 73 patients with open repair of Achilles tendon. Duration of the rehabilitation, post-operative complications and using of alternative fixation system in a post-operative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture were also assessed.
62 % of evaluated patients achieved good or excellent results. There was no significant difference between the open and percutaneous repair. In a case of percutaneous repair there was achieved a shortening of post-fixation rehabilitation time in compare with open repair about two weeks. Eighteen postoperative complications were identified after open Achilles tendon repair, resulting in institutional complication rate of 24.7 %. The complications included 6 (8.2%) superficial wound infections. 7 (9.6%) deep crural flebothromboses, 4 (5.5%) re-ruptures and 1 (1.4%) sural nerve injury. Seven postoperative complications were identified after percuaneous Achilles tendon repair, resulting in institutional complication rate of 11.8%. The complications included 3 (7.1%) sural nerve injury and 2 (4.7%) deep crural flebothromboses. The vacuum brace system VacoAchill was used in 23 patients and involved in shortening of duration of rehabilitation about 20%.
Percutaneous suture of Achilles tendon rupture is a simple and safety method, that brings comparable functional results to open repair with the same time of post-operative fixation and with a significantly lower rate of complications. The vacuum brace system VacoAchill is an alternative method of post-operative fixation allowing earlier mobilization and shortening patient's disability.
作者评估并比较了闭合性跟腱断裂的经皮修复和开放性修复的结果。
作者回顾性研究了2000年至2005年间在帕尔杜比采地区医院接受治疗的115例皮下跟腱断裂患者。他们采用了100分的汉诺威跟腱评分。42例患者仅采用经皮技术进行手术,73例患者采用开放性跟腱修复术。还评估了康复时间、术后并发症以及跟腱断裂术后治疗中替代固定系统的使用情况。
62%的评估患者获得了良好或优异的结果。开放性修复和经皮修复之间没有显著差异。与开放性修复相比,经皮修复术后固定康复时间缩短了约两周。开放性跟腱修复术后发现18例术后并发症,机构并发症发生率为24.7%。并发症包括6例(8.2%)浅表伤口感染、7例(9.6%)小腿深部静脉血栓形成、4例(5.5%)再次断裂和1例(1.4%)腓肠神经损伤。经皮跟腱修复术后发现7例术后并发症,机构并发症发生率为11.8%。并发症包括3例(7.1%)腓肠神经损伤和2例(4.7%)小腿深部静脉血栓形成。23例患者使用了真空支具系统VacoAchill,使康复时间缩短了约20%。
跟腱断裂的经皮缝合是一种简单且安全的方法,在术后固定时间相同的情况下,其功能结果与开放性修复相当,且并发症发生率显著更低。真空支具系统VacoAchill是一种术后固定的替代方法,可实现更早的活动并缩短患者的残疾时间。