Parikh Shailja V, Jacobi Joshua A, Chu Edwin, Addo Tayo A, Warner John J, Delaney Kathleen A, McGuire Darren K, deLemos James A, Cigarroa Joaquin E, Murphy Sabina A, Keeley Ellen C
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.021. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
Most hospitals that perform primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the United States exceed the recommended door-to-balloon time. There is heightened interest in identifying and eliminating factors that introduce delay.
We performed a key process analysis of our primary PCI program, assessed the relative contribution of individual time intervals on total ischemic time, and identified predictors of delay.
Median times and predictors of delay within each time interval were determined for the entire STEMI cohort ("real world") and after exclusion of patients with atypical symptoms and/or presentations of STEMI that resulted in inherent delay in diagnosis and treatment ("ideal world"). Delays in therapy were symptom onset to presentation (120 minutes [interquartile range, IQR, 60-310 minutes, ideal world] and 150 minutes [IQR 60-360 minutes, real world]; predictors of delay were peripheral vascular disease, self-transportation, daytime and weekend presentation); door-to-balloon time (118.5 minutes [IQR 96-141 minutes, ideal world] and 125 minutes [IQR 100-170 minutes, real world]; predictors of delay were female sex, previous stroke, nighttime and weekend presentation, and cardiogenic shock); and symptom onset to first balloon inflation (272 minutes [IQR 187-465 minutes, ideal world] and 297 minutes [IQR 198-560 minutes, real world]; predictors of delay were peripheral vascular disease, weekend presentation, and self-transportation).
Key process analysis of a primary PCI program identifies treatment delays unique to the hospital and the patient population it serves.
在美国,大多数为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者实施直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的医院都超过了推荐的门球时间。人们对识别和消除导致延误的因素的兴趣日益浓厚。
我们对我们的直接PCI项目进行了关键流程分析,评估了各个时间间隔对总缺血时间的相对贡献,并确定了延误的预测因素。
确定了整个STEMI队列(“现实世界”)以及排除非典型症状和/或STEMI表现导致诊断和治疗固有延误的患者后(“理想世界”)每个时间间隔内的中位时间和延误预测因素。治疗延误包括症状发作至就诊时间(120分钟[四分位间距,IQR,60 - 310分钟,理想世界]和150分钟[IQR 60 - 360分钟,现实世界];延误的预测因素为外周血管疾病、自行就医、白天和周末就诊);门球时间(118.5分钟[IQR 96 - 141分钟,理想世界]和125分钟[IQR 100 - 170分钟,现实世界];延误的预测因素为女性、既往中风、夜间和周末就诊以及心源性休克);以及症状发作至首次球囊扩张时间(272分钟[IQR 187 - 465分钟,理想世界]和297分钟[IQR 198 - 560分钟,现实世界];延误的预测因素为外周血管疾病、周末就诊和自行就医)。
直接PCI项目的关键流程分析可识别出该医院及其所服务患者群体特有的治疗延误情况。