Berretta Nicola, Nisticò Robert, Bernardi Giorgio, Mercuri Nicola Biagio
Laboratory of Experimental Neurology, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Prog Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;84(4):343-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.12.004. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
It is widely accepted that the complexity and adaptability of neuronal communication, which is necessary for integrative and higher functions of the brain, is amply represented by plastic changes occurring at synaptic level. Therefore, long-term modifications of synaptic efficacy between neurons have been considered the cellular basis of learning and memory. Accordingly, there is a plethora of experimental evidence supporting this contention. Indeed, synaptic modifications in the hippocampus, the cerebral and cerebellar cortices regulate composite neuronal functions such those related to cognition, awareness, memory storage, and motion. In recent years, the concept that enduring changes of excitatory glutamatergic synaptic potentials [long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD)] are not limited to the hippocampus and cortices but occur also in other brain areas has emerged. For instance, plasticity at different excitatory pathways has been clearly demonstrated in the basal ganglia. Here we present an overview of the experimental data regarding synaptic plasticity in the basal ganglia and highlight how results reported in the literature are often contradictory, especially when compared to those obtained in the hippocampal area. In trying to propose possible explanations to some of these contradictions, we present a holistic approach that re-interprets the basal ganglia synaptic plasticity in terms of expression of physiological and pathological phenomena and therapeutic effects of drugs.
人们普遍认为,神经元通讯的复杂性和适应性是大脑整合及更高功能所必需的,突触水平发生的可塑性变化充分体现了这一点。因此,神经元之间突触效能的长期改变被认为是学习和记忆的细胞基础。相应地,有大量实验证据支持这一论点。事实上,海马体、大脑皮层和小脑皮层中的突触修饰调节着复合神经元功能,如与认知、意识、记忆存储和运动相关的功能。近年来,兴奋性谷氨酸能突触电位的持久变化[长时程增强(LTP)和长时程抑制(LTD)]不仅局限于海马体和皮层,也发生在其他脑区的概念已经出现。例如,在基底神经节中,不同兴奋性通路的可塑性已得到明确证实。在此,我们概述了有关基底神经节突触可塑性的实验数据,并强调文献中报道的结果往往相互矛盾,尤其是与在海马体区域获得的结果相比时。在试图对其中一些矛盾提出可能的解释时,我们提出了一种整体方法,从生理和病理现象的表达以及药物的治疗效果方面重新解释基底神经节突触可塑性。