Zanjani Faika, Mavandadi Shahrzad, TenHave Tom, Katz Ira, Durai Nalla B, Krahn Dean, Llorente Maria, Kirchner JoAnn, Olsen Edwin, Van Stone William, Cooley Susan, Oslin David W
Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 41094, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Jan;63(1):98-106. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.1.98.
This investigation aims to determine the 12-month drinking trajectory of older at-risk drinkers in treatment. Furthermore, the drinking trajectory between at-risk drinkers who had met the threshold suggestive of alcohol dependence (problem at-risk drinkers) and those who did not meet this threshold (nonproblematic at-risk drinkers) were compared.
This investigation is a component of the PRISM-E (Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly) Study, a multisite randomized trial comparing service use, outcomes, and cost between Integrated (IC) versus Enhanced Specialty Referral (ESR) care models for older (65+ years) adults with depression, anxiety, and/or at-risk alcohol consumption. This investigation focuses only on at-risk drinkers, generally defined as exceeding recommended drinking limits, which in the case of older adults has been classified as consuming more than one drink per day. Two hundred fifty-eight randomized older at-risk drinkers were examined, of whom 56% were problem drinkers identified through the Short Michigan Alcohol Screening Test-Geriatric version.
Over time, all at-risk drinkers showed a significant reduction in drinking. Problem drinkers showed reductions in average weekly consumption and number of occurrences of binge drinking at 3, 6, and 12 months, whereas nonproblematic drinkers showed significant reductions in average weekly consumption at 3, 6, and 12 months and number of occurrences of binge drinking at only 6 months. IC treatment assignment led to higher engagement in treatment, which led to better binge drinking outcomes for problem drinkers. Despite significant reductions in drinking, approximately 29% of participants displayed at-risk drinking at the end of the study.
Results suggest that older at-risk drinkers, both problem and nonproblematic, show a considerable decrease in drinking, with slightly greater improvement evidenced in problem drinkers and higher engagement in treatment seen in those assigned to IC.
本研究旨在确定接受治疗的老年高危饮酒者的12个月饮酒轨迹。此外,还比较了达到酒精依赖阈值的高危饮酒者(有问题的高危饮酒者)和未达到该阈值的高危饮酒者(无问题的高危饮酒者)之间的饮酒轨迹。
本研究是PRISM-E(老年人物质滥用和心理健康初级保健研究)的一部分,这是一项多中心随机试验,比较综合护理(IC)与强化专科转诊(ESR)护理模式对65岁及以上患有抑郁症、焦虑症和/或高危饮酒的老年人的服务使用情况、治疗效果和成本。本研究仅关注高危饮酒者,一般定义为超过推荐饮酒限量,对于老年人来说,推荐限量为每天饮酒不超过一杯。研究共纳入了258名随机分组的老年高危饮酒者,其中56%是通过密歇根酒精筛查测试老年版确定的问题饮酒者。
随着时间的推移,所有高危饮酒者的饮酒量均显著减少。问题饮酒者在3个月、6个月和12个月时平均每周饮酒量和暴饮次数均有所减少,而无问题饮酒者在3个月、6个月和12个月时平均每周饮酒量显著减少,仅在6个月时暴饮次数减少。IC治疗方案导致更高的治疗参与度,这使得问题饮酒者的暴饮结局更好。尽管饮酒量显著减少,但约29%的参与者在研究结束时仍存在高危饮酒行为。
结果表明,有问题和无问题的老年高危饮酒者的饮酒量均有显著下降,问题饮酒者的改善略大,接受IC治疗方案的患者治疗参与度更高。