Shrader-Frechette Kristin
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Account Res. 2007 Oct-Dec;14(4):211-54. doi: 10.1080/08989620701670161.
Arguing that the 2006 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human-subjects rule allows use of unethical third-party research (on pregnant women and children) in setting pesticide regulations, this article first (a) provides a brief history of U.S. pesticide regulation, particularly regarding childhood safety. Next it (b) outlines ethical and scientific loopholes in the 2006 EPA rule; (c) shows how the Human Subjects Review Board, mandated by the 2006 rule, has been implemented in flawed ways; and (d) illustrates that one source of problems with the rule may be influence by those with conflicts of interest.
本文认为2006年美国环境保护局(EPA)的人体研究规则允许在制定农药法规时使用不道德的第三方研究(针对孕妇和儿童),首先(a)简要介绍了美国农药监管的历史,特别是关于儿童安全方面的历史。接下来(b)概述了2006年EPA规则中的伦理和科学漏洞;(c)展示了2006年规则所要求的人体研究审查委员会是如何以有缺陷的方式实施的;以及(d)说明该规则问题的一个来源可能受到利益冲突者的影响。