Vilnet Anna A, Konstantinova Nadezhda A, Troitsky Aleksey V
Polar-alpine Botanical Garden-Institute of Kola SC, RAS, 184236 Murmanskaya Province, Kirovsk, Russia.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Apr;47(1):403-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.12.013. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
Nuclear ITS1-2 and chloroplast trnL-F were sequenced for 21 taxa of Lophozia s. str., two species of Protolophozia, five species of Schistochilopsis, three species of Barbilophozia and Obtusifolium obtusum. The topologies of phylogenetic trees for 49 taxa constructed from combined sequences of these regions by maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods are similar. The species of Lophozia s. str., excluding Lophozia sudetica, combine into two main clades and these contradict subdivisions of Lophozia s. str. based on morphology. The species status of Lophozia lantratoviae is confirmed, whereas Lophozia austro-sibirica is almost identical to Lophozia ventricosa var. guttulata. The genus Schistochilopsis is paraphyletic and occupies basal position to Lophozia s. str., while O. obtusum is clearly separated from Schistochilopsis. A low level of divergence was found between L. sudetica and Protolophozia debiliformes, which are closer to Barbilophozia than to Lophozia s. str. Molecular divergence between geographically remote populations of L. sudetica, Lophozia silvicoloides and Protolophozia debiliformis are low as opposed to those of Lophozia polaris, Lophozia pellucida or Lophozia excisa. Consideration of the trnL intron P8 region indels alone can adequately assign some clades revealed by tree building. A consensus secondary structure of the trnL intron P8 region could not be inferred for taxa studied mainly due to high sequence length diversity originated from deletions.
对21个狭义洛弗苔藓属类群、2种原洛弗苔藓属物种、5种裂瓣苔属物种、3种髯苔属物种以及钝叶耳叶苔进行了核糖体DNA ITS1 - 2和叶绿体trnL - F测序。通过最大简约法、最大似然法和贝叶斯法,基于这些区域的联合序列构建了49个类群的系统发育树,其拓扑结构相似。狭义洛弗苔藓属类群(不包括苏台德洛弗苔藓)合并为两个主要分支,这与基于形态学的狭义洛弗苔藓属分类相矛盾。兰特拉托夫洛弗苔藓的物种地位得到确认,而南西伯利亚洛弗苔藓与具疣洛弗苔藓变种几乎相同。裂瓣苔属是并系群,位于狭义洛弗苔藓属的基部位置,而钝叶耳叶苔与裂瓣苔属明显分开。苏台德洛弗苔藓和柔弱原洛弗苔藓之间的分歧水平较低,它们与髯苔属的关系比与狭义洛弗苔藓属更近。苏台德洛弗苔藓、林地洛弗苔藓和柔弱原洛弗苔藓地理上遥远种群之间的分子分歧较低,这与极地洛弗苔藓、透明洛弗苔藓或撕裂洛弗苔藓不同。仅考虑trnL内含子P8区域的插入缺失就可以充分地对建树所揭示的一些分支进行归类。由于缺失导致序列长度多样性高,主要研究类群的trnL内含子P8区域的共有二级结构无法推断。