• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雌激素替代疗法对乳腺癌风险影响的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer.

作者信息

Steinberg K K, Thacker S B, Smith S J, Stroup D F, Zack M M, Flanders W D, Berkelman R L

机构信息

Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

出版信息

JAMA. 1991 Apr 17;265(15):1985-90.

PMID:1826136
Abstract

To quantify the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on breast cancer risk, we combined dose-response slopes of the relative risk of breast cancer against the duration of estrogen use across 16 studies. Using this summary dose-response slope, we calculated the proportional increase in risk of breast cancer for each year of estrogen use. For women who experienced any type of menopause, risk did not appear to increase until after at least 5 years of estrogen use. After 15 years of estrogen use, we found a 30% increase in the risk of breast cancer (relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 1.6). The increase in risk was largely due to results of studies that included premenopausal women or women using estradiol (with or without progestin), studies for which the estimated relative risk was 2.2 (CI, 1.4 to 3.4) after 15 years. Among women with a family history of breast cancer, those who had ever used estrogen replacement had a significantly higher risk (3.4; CI, 2.0 to 6.0) than those who had not (1.5; CI, 1.2 to 1.7).

摘要

为了量化雌激素替代疗法对乳腺癌风险的影响,我们汇总了16项研究中乳腺癌相对风险相对于雌激素使用时长的剂量反应斜率。利用这个汇总的剂量反应斜率,我们计算了每年使用雌激素时乳腺癌风险的比例增加情况。对于经历任何类型更年期的女性,风险似乎在使用雌激素至少5年后才会增加。使用雌激素15年后,我们发现乳腺癌风险增加了30%(相对风险为1.3;95%置信区间[CI]为1.2至1.6)。风险增加在很大程度上归因于纳入了绝经前女性或使用雌二醇(无论是否联合孕激素)的女性的研究结果,对于这些研究,15年后估计的相对风险为2.2(CI为1.4至3.4)。在有乳腺癌家族史的女性中,曾经使用过雌激素替代疗法的女性的风险(3.4;CI为2.0至6.0)显著高于未使用过的女性(1.5;CI为1.2至1.7)。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the risk of breast cancer.雌激素替代疗法对乳腺癌风险影响的荟萃分析。
JAMA. 1991 Apr 17;265(15):1985-90.
2
Menopausal estrogen replacement therapy and breast cancer.更年期雌激素替代疗法与乳腺癌
Arch Intern Med. 1991 Jan;151(1):67-72.
3
Combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of breast cancer in middle-aged women.中年女性联合雌激素和孕激素激素替代疗法与乳腺癌风险的关系
JAMA. 1995 Jul 12;274(2):137-42.
4
Prospective study of estrogen replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
JAMA. 1990 Nov 28;264(20):2648-53.
5
The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性使用雌激素和孕激素与患乳腺癌风险
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 15;332(24):1589-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506153322401.
6
Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.绝经后女性中雌激素加孕激素的使用与乳腺X线密度:妇女健康倡议随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Sep 21;97(18):1366-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji279.
7
The postmenopausal estrogen/breast cancer controversy.绝经后雌激素与乳腺癌的争议。
JAMA. 1992 Oct 14;268(14):1900-2.
8
Hormone replacement therapy and cancer.激素替代疗法与癌症。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001 Dec;15(6):453-65.
9
Breast cancer risk with postmenopausal hormonal treatment.绝经后激素治疗与乳腺癌风险
Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):545-60. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi028. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
10
Cancer incidence and mortality in women receiving estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy--long-term follow-up of a Swedish cohort.接受雌激素和雌激素 - 孕激素替代疗法的女性的癌症发病率和死亡率——瑞典队列的长期随访
Int J Cancer. 1996 Jul 29;67(3):327-32. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960729)67:3<327::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-T.

引用本文的文献

1
Membrane estrogen receptor α signaling modulates the sensitivity to estradiol treatment in a dose- and tissue- dependent manner.膜雌激素受体 α 信号转导以剂量和组织依赖的方式调节雌二醇治疗的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 3;13(1):9046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36146-9.
2
Factors for the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.乳腺癌一级预防的因素:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析
J Res Health Sci. 2021 Jul 20;21(3):e00520. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.57.
3
Menopause and the Skin: Old Favorites and New Innovations in Cosmeceuticals for Estrogen-Deficient Skin.
更年期与皮肤:针对雌激素缺乏性皮肤的药妆品中的经典与创新
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Feb;11(1):53-69. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00468-7. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Effect of Breast Cancer and Adjuvant Therapy on Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells: Implications for the Role of ADSCs in Regenerative Strategies for Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌及辅助治疗对脂肪来源基质细胞的影响:脂肪来源基质细胞在乳房重建再生策略中的作用。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2021 Apr;17(2):523-538. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10038-1. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
2019 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards: An Interview with Gordon D. Schiff.2019年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖:对戈登·D·希夫的访谈
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jul;46(7):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Using a Machine Learning System to Identify and Prevent Medication Prescribing Errors: A Clinical and Cost Analysis Evaluation.使用机器学习系统识别和预防用药处方错误:临床与成本分析评估
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jan;46(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.09.008. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
7
Depomedroxyprogesterone acetate therapy for hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer: no unfavorable impact on recurrence and survival.醋酸甲地孕酮治疗乳腺癌幸存者热潮红:对复发和生存无不利影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2139-2143. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05013-7. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
8
Family history influences the tumor characteristics and prognosis of breast cancers developing during postmenopausal hormone therapy.家族史会影响绝经后激素治疗期间发生的乳腺癌的肿瘤特征和预后。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jul;17(3):321-331. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0046-2.
9
An Example of Breast Cancer Regression on Imaging.影像学上乳腺癌消退的一个例子。
Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Nov 6;1(2):27-37. doi: 10.2484/rcr.v1i2.4. eCollection 2006.
10
Efficacy of proline in the treatment of menopause.脯氨酸在绝经治疗中的疗效。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016 Mar;241(6):611-9. doi: 10.1177/1535370216629011. Epub 2016 Jan 31.