• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证急诊医学/严格评价主题。社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗起始4小时规则背后的证据。

Evidence-based emergency medicine/critically appraised topic. Evidence behind the 4-hour rule for initiation of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Yu Kenneth T, Wyer Peter C

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Residency Program, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):651-62, 662.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.022. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.022
PMID:18272253
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

US regulatory authorities mandate delivery of antibiotics within 4 hours of arrival for patients being admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. This evidence-based emergency medicine review examines the scientific evidence pertaining to this requirement.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, other databases, and bibliographies. We selected articles allowing comparison of inpatient or 30-day mortality among patients receiving early versus delayed antibiotics. We prospectively categorized studies according to whether they were retrospective or prospective and whether they adjusted for severity with the Pneumonia Severity Index. We evaluated the precision with which the interval to initiation of antibiotic therapy was defined and the compliance of retrospective studies with standard reporting criteria for chart reviews.

RESULTS

We identified 13 observational studies reporting comparative outcomes in patients receiving early versus delayed antibiotic initiation, of which 10 allowed calculation of our primary outcome. Of the 4 prospective studies, 1 allowed severity adjustment using the Pneumonia Severity Index score. Among the retrospective studies, definition of time to antibiotic therapy was frequently imprecisely defined, and compliance with standard reporting criteria for chart review was scanty in the subgroup lacking severity adjustment. Odds ratios (ORs) for mortality varied widely. One methodologically weak study reported a large benefit of early antibiotics (OR for mortality antibiotics <4 hours versus >4 hours 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08 to 0.71). The one study that used prospective enrollment and severity adjustment using the Pneumonia Severity Index observed a contrary result (adjusted OR for mortality, antibiotics <4 hours versus >4 hours 1.99; 95% CI 1.22 to 13.45). Results from studies reporting an 8-hour cutoff also varied in magnitude and direction of effect.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from observational studies fails to confirm decreased mortality with early administration of antibiotics in stable patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Although timely administration of antibiotics to patients with confirmed community-acquired pneumonia should be encouraged, an inflated sense of priority of the 4-hour time frame is not justified by the evidence.

摘要

研究目的

美国监管机构规定,因社区获得性肺炎入院的患者需在入院后4小时内使用抗生素。本循证医学综述探讨了与该要求相关的科学证据。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆及其他数据库和参考文献。我们选择了能够比较早期使用抗生素与延迟使用抗生素的患者住院期间或30天死亡率的文章。我们根据研究是回顾性还是前瞻性以及是否使用肺炎严重程度指数对严重程度进行调整,对研究进行前瞻性分类。我们评估了抗生素治疗开始时间间隔的定义精度以及回顾性研究对图表审查标准报告标准的依从性。

结果

我们确定了13项观察性研究,报告了早期使用抗生素与延迟使用抗生素患者的比较结果,其中10项研究可以计算我们的主要结局。在4项前瞻性研究中,1项研究允许使用肺炎严重程度指数评分进行严重程度调整。在回顾性研究中,抗生素治疗时间的定义往往不精确,在缺乏严重程度调整的亚组中,对图表审查标准报告标准的依从性很差。死亡率的优势比(OR)差异很大。一项方法学上较弱的研究报告了早期使用抗生素的巨大益处(抗生素使用时间<4小时与>4小时相比,死亡率的OR为0.24;95%置信区间[CI]为0.08至0.71)。一项使用前瞻性入组并使用肺炎严重程度指数进行严重程度调整的研究观察到了相反的结果(抗生素使用时间<4小时与>4小时相比,调整后的死亡率OR为1.99;95%CI为1.22至13.45)。报告8小时截止时间的研究结果在效应大小和方向上也有所不同。

结论

观察性研究的证据未能证实早期使用抗生素可降低稳定的社区获得性肺炎患者的死亡率。虽然应鼓励对确诊的社区获得性肺炎患者及时使用抗生素,但证据并不支持将4小时时间框架的优先级过度提高。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based emergency medicine/critically appraised topic. Evidence behind the 4-hour rule for initiation of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.循证急诊医学/严格评价主题。社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗起始4小时规则背后的证据。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):651-62, 662.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.022. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
2
Continuity of antibiotic therapy in patients admitted from the emergency department.急诊科收治患者抗生素治疗的连续性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;42(1):117-23. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.257.
3
Identification of 90% of patients ultimately diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia within four hours of emergency department arrival may not be feasible.在急诊科就诊后四小时内识别出最终被诊断为社区获得性肺炎的90%患者可能不可行。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 May;49(5):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
4
The impact of emergency department crowding measures on time to antibiotics for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.急诊科拥挤措施对社区获得性肺炎患者使用抗生素时间的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):510-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.021. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
5
Effect of emergency department crowding on time to antibiotics in patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia.急诊科拥挤对社区获得性肺炎入院患者使用抗生素时间的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):501-9, 509.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.08.003.
6
Audit of the management of patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎入院患者管理的审计
Ir Med J. 2006 May;99(5):138-40.
7
Timing of antibiotic administration and outcomes for Medicare patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.医疗保险参保的社区获得性肺炎住院患者抗生素给药时机与治疗结果
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):637-44. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.637.
8
Effects of delayed oxygenation assessment on time to antibiotic delivery and mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.延迟氧合评估对重症社区获得性肺炎患者抗生素给药时间及死亡率的影响
Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2509-14. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000287587.43801.9C.
9
Azithromycin monotherapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a 31/2-year experience from a veterans affairs hospital.阿奇霉素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一家退伍军人事务医院3.5年的经验
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1718-26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1718.
10
Efficacy of exclusively oral antibiotic therapy in patients hospitalized with nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study and meta-analysis.单纯口服抗生素治疗非重症社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效:一项回顾性研究和荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.11.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S104-S216. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24677. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
2
Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern from Hospitalized Pneumonia Patients in National Referral Infectious Disease Hospital in Indonesia.印度尼西亚国家转诊传染病医院住院肺炎患者的抗菌药物敏感性模式
Adv Med. 2022 Aug 29;2022:3455948. doi: 10.1155/2022/3455948. eCollection 2022.
3
Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure.
美国传染病学会立场文件:国家严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑包(SEP-1)脓毒症质量测量推荐修订版。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 16;72(4):541-552. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa059.
4
Guidelines for Antibiotic Prescription in Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;23(Suppl 1):S1-S63. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23101.
5
Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia.头孢比普用于治疗肺炎。
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 Sep;32 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):17-23.
6
Variation in Emergency Department Adherence to Treatment Guidelines for Inpatient Pneumonia and Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科对住院肺炎和脓毒症治疗指南的依从性差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(8):908-920. doi: 10.1111/acem.13639. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
Short-course versus long-course therapy of the same antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia in adolescent and adult outpatients.青少年及成人门诊社区获得性肺炎患者使用同一种抗生素的短程与长程治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 6;9(9):CD009070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009070.pub2.
8
Microbial Etiology of Pneumonia: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Resistance Patterns.肺炎的微生物病因学:流行病学、诊断及耐药模式
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Dec 16;17(12):2120. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122120.
9
Pneumonia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Does Vancomycin Heteroresistance Matter?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的肺炎:万古霉素异质性耐药重要吗?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jan 4;60(3):1708-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02388-15.
10
Community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎
Lancet. 2015 Sep 12;386(9998):1097-108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60733-4. Epub 2015 Aug 12.