D'Angiulli Amedeo, Reeves Adam
Carleton University, Child Studies and Psychology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Psychol. 2007 Winter;120(4):521-51.
We examined how the relationship between ratings of vividness (or image strength) and image latency might reflect the concerted action of two visual imagery pathways hypothesized by Kosslyn (1994): the ventral pathway, processing object properties, and the dorsal pathway, processing locative properties of mental images. Participants formed their images at small or large angular display sizes, varying the amount of size scaling needed. In Experiment 1, display size varied between participants, and images were trial unique. The higher the vividness, the faster the generation of small images (requiring size scaling of less than 10 degrees), which would recruit mainly the ventral pathway. This vivid-is-fast relationship changed for large images (requiring size scaling of 10 degrees or more), which would recruit mainly the dorsal pathway. The size-dependent alteration of the vivid-is-fast relationship was replicated in the first block of Experiment 2. However, when repeated over 3 consecutive blocks, image generation sped up, and gradually the vivid-is-fast relationship tended to occur for all display sizes until complete automatization of image generation occurred. The findings suggest that differential patterns of vividness-latency relationship can reflect the types of images involved, their relative ventral and dorsal contributions, and the involvement of working memory.
我们研究了生动性(或图像强度)评分与图像潜伏期之间的关系如何反映科斯林(1994年)假设的两条视觉表象通路的协同作用:腹侧通路,处理物体属性;背侧通路,处理心理图像的定位属性。参与者以小或大的视角显示尺寸形成他们的图像,改变所需的尺寸缩放量。在实验1中,显示尺寸在参与者之间变化,并且图像在每次试验中都是独特的。生动性越高,生成小图像(所需尺寸缩放小于10度)的速度就越快,这主要会激活腹侧通路。对于大图像(所需尺寸缩放为10度或更大),这种生动性与速度的关系发生了变化,这主要会激活背侧通路。实验2的第一个模块重复了生动性与速度关系随尺寸变化的情况。然而,当连续3个模块重复时,图像生成速度加快,并且逐渐地,对于所有显示尺寸都倾向于出现生动性与速度的关系,直到图像生成完全自动化。研究结果表明,生动性与潜伏期关系的不同模式可以反映所涉及图像的类型、它们相对的腹侧和背侧贡献以及工作记忆的参与情况。