Barbato Gaetano, Pergolini Francesco, Carinci Valeria, Di Pasquale Giuseppe
Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Mar;9(3):273-6. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3280c8529c.
Atrial transseptal puncture is nowadays routinely performed in the electrophysiology laboratory in order to map and ablate the left atrium. Some concerns, however, exist as to whether to perform atrial transseptal puncture in patients with heart valve prostheses, because of the risk of damaging the valve and of prosthetic valve-related thromboembolic complications. Only a few data are available on transseptal puncture for catheter ablation in patients with heart valve prostheses. We report our experience with atrial transseptal puncture carried out during an electrophysiological procedure in patients with prosthetic valves.
Between January 2003 and January 2006, we performed 227 transseptal punctures in order to map and ablate the left atrium. Among these, nine patients (3.9%) had a heart valve prosthesis. The safety and feasibility of the procedure are reported as well as results at 6-month follow-up.
Atrial transseptal puncture was successful in all patients. In four patients the procedure was performed under transoesophageal guidance after failure of the first attempt. The clinical arrhythmia was successfully ablated in eight patients (88.8%) and one procedure was interrupted because of atrial fibrillation. In seven cases the arrhythmia was successfully ablated in the left atrium; in one patient the arrhythmia was ablated on the right side of the septum after exclusion of a left atrial origin of the arrhythmia following completion of the mapping procedure. One patient had transient vision loss after the procedure, but no other complications were documented during or after atrial transseptal puncture.
Patients with valve prostheses and severely symptomatic drug-refractory arrhythmias can be considered candidates for atrial transseptal puncture and left atrial mapping and ablation. Atrial transseptal puncture is feasible, even though it requires experienced operators.
如今,经房间隔穿刺术在电生理实验室中常用于绘制左心房图谱及进行消融治疗。然而,对于心脏瓣膜置换术后患者是否进行经房间隔穿刺存在一些担忧,因为存在损坏瓣膜以及发生人工瓣膜相关血栓栓塞并发症的风险。目前关于心脏瓣膜置换术后患者行导管消融术时经房间隔穿刺的资料较少。我们报告在人工瓣膜患者电生理手术过程中进行经房间隔穿刺的经验。
2003年1月至2006年1月期间,我们进行了227次经房间隔穿刺以绘制左心房图谱及进行消融治疗。其中,9例患者(3.9%)有人工心脏瓣膜。报告了该手术的安全性和可行性以及6个月随访结果。
所有患者经房间隔穿刺均成功。4例患者在首次尝试失败后在经食管引导下完成手术。8例患者(88.8%)临床心律失常成功消融,1例手术因房颤中断。7例患者心律失常在左心房成功消融;1例患者在完成标测程序排除心律失常源于左心房后,在房间隔右侧进行了消融。1例患者术后出现短暂视力丧失,但经房间隔穿刺期间及术后未记录到其他并发症。
人工瓣膜且有严重症状且药物难治性心律失常的患者可考虑作为经房间隔穿刺及左心房标测和消融的候选者。经房间隔穿刺是可行的,尽管这需要经验丰富的操作者。