Krämer Ulrike M, Büttner Sarah, Roth Gerhard, Münte Thomas F
Department of Neuropsychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1464-77. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20103.
Reactive aggression following provocation is a frequent form of human social behavior. The neural basis of reactive aggression, especially its control, remains poorly understood, however. We conducted an event-related potential (ERP) study using a competitive reaction time task that elicits aggression through provocation. Participants were selected from a larger sample because of extreme scores in trait aggressiveness, yielding high and low trait aggressive groups. As each trial in the task is separated into a decision phase, during which the punishment level for the opponent is set, and an outcome phase, during which the punishment is applied or received, we were able to disentangle provocation-related and evaluation-related modulations of the ERPs during the aggressive interaction. Specifically, we observed an enhanced frontal negativity during the decision phase under high provocation that was positively correlated with the participants' ability to refrain from retaliation. This held true for high trait aggressive participants only, pointing to a higher need for inhibitory and control processes in these people when provoked. During the outcome phase, we detected a mediofrontal negativity in loss compared to win trials, resembling previous ERP findings to negative feedback stimuli, which have been linked to the evaluation of an outcome's valence. This mediofrontal negativity was differentially pronounced in aggressive and nonaggressive participants: Nonaggressive participants showed only a slightly smaller mediofrontal negativity in win than in loss trials, suggesting that for them punishing the opponent had a similar negative valence as being punished.
挑衅后的反应性攻击是人类社会行为的一种常见形式。然而,反应性攻击的神经基础,尤其是其控制机制,仍知之甚少。我们进行了一项事件相关电位(ERP)研究,使用了一个竞争性反应时任务,该任务通过挑衅引发攻击行为。参与者是从一个更大的样本中挑选出来的,因为他们在特质攻击性方面得分极高,从而形成了高特质攻击性组和低特质攻击性组。由于任务中的每个试验都分为一个决策阶段(在此阶段设定对对手的惩罚水平)和一个结果阶段(在此阶段实施或接受惩罚),我们能够在攻击性互动过程中区分与挑衅相关和与评价相关的ERP调制。具体而言,我们观察到在高挑衅情况下的决策阶段,额叶负波增强,且与参与者克制报复的能力呈正相关。这仅在高特质攻击性参与者中成立,表明这些人在受到挑衅时对抑制和控制过程有更高的需求。在结果阶段,与获胜试验相比,我们在失败试验中检测到额中负波,这与之前对负反馈刺激的ERP研究结果相似,负反馈刺激与对结果效价的评价有关。这种额中负波在攻击性和非攻击性参与者中表现不同:非攻击性参与者在获胜试验中的额中负波仅比失败试验略小,这表明对他们来说,惩罚对手与被惩罚具有相似的负效价。