Pinto Yaïr, Olviers Christin N L, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jan;70(1):166-78. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.1.166.
Pinto, Olivers, and Theeuwes (2006) showed that a static target can be efficiently found among different types of dynamically changing distractors. They hypothesized that attention employs a broad division between static and dynamic information, a hypothesis that conforms with earlier research. In the present study, we investigated whether attention can only make use of this crude division or can exploit more subtle discriminations within the dynamic domain. In Experiment 1, participants were able to efficiently find a blinking target among moving distractors and moving targets among blinking distractors, although all items changed at the same rate and produced the same change in local luminance. In Experiment 2, search for a dynamic target among dynamic distractors was aided when we gave the distractors additional dynamic cues. Experiment 3 showed that making the displays equiluminant affected search efficiency for a static target among moving distractors, but not among blinking distractors. The findings refute the broad division hypothesis and suggest that object continuity plays an important role in selection.
平托、奥利弗斯和特乌韦斯(2006年)表明,在不同类型的动态变化干扰物中可以有效地找到静态目标。他们推测,注意力在静态和动态信息之间进行了广泛的区分,这一推测与早期研究一致。在本研究中,我们调查了注意力是否只能利用这种粗略的区分,还是可以在动态领域内利用更细微的辨别。在实验1中,参与者能够在移动的干扰物中有效地找到闪烁的目标,以及在闪烁的干扰物中找到移动的目标,尽管所有项目以相同的速率变化并在局部亮度上产生相同的变化。在实验2中,当我们给干扰物添加额外的动态线索时,有助于在动态干扰物中搜索动态目标。实验3表明,使显示器等亮度会影响在移动干扰物中搜索静态目标的效率,但在闪烁干扰物中则不然。这些发现驳斥了广泛区分假说,并表明物体连续性在选择中起着重要作用。