Horasanli Kaya, Silay Mesrur Selcuk, Altay Bulent, Tanriverdi Orhan, Sarica Kemal, Miroglu Cengiz
Department of 2nd Urology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):247-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.017.
To compare the short term outcomes of photoselective vaporization (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for glands larger than 70 mL in a prospective randomized trial.
Seventy-six consecutive patients with enlarged prostatic adenomas of 70 to 100 mL were randomly assigned for surgical treatment with TURP (n = 37) or PVP (n = 39). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores, maximum flow rates (Qmax), postvoid urine residues (PVR), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volumes were recorded. Operative data, complications, catheter removal, and hospitalization periods were also recorded. Patients were reassessed at 3 and 6 months.
Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Mean preoperative TRUS volume was 88 +/- 9.2 mL in the TURP group and 86.1 +/- 8.8 mL in the PVP group. The procedure was significantly shorter for the TURP group (51 +/- 17.2 minutes versus 87 +/- 18.3 minutes, P <0.05), catheter removal (3.9 +/- 1.2 days and 1.7 +/- 0.8 days, P <0.05), and hospital stay (4.8 +/- 1.2 days versus 2 +/- 0.7 days, P <0.05) were shorter in the PVP group. A significant difference in IPSS, Qmax and PVR values was observed within the follow-up period in favor of the TURP. The percentage volume reduction was significantly higher in TURP group. Reoperation was necessary in 7 patients in PVP but none in TURP group.
Although PVP offers advantageous over TURP with regard to intraoperative and perioperative safety, early functional results of TURP are superior to PVP in patients with enlarged prostates larger than 70 mL.
在一项前瞻性随机试验中,比较光选择性汽化术(PVP)和经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗前列腺体积大于70 mL患者的短期疗效。
连续纳入76例前列腺腺瘤体积在70至100 mL的患者,随机分配接受TURP手术治疗(n = 37)或PVP手术治疗(n = 39)。记录国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF - 5)评分、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)以及经直肠超声(TRUS)测量的前列腺体积。还记录手术数据、并发症、导尿管拔除情况及住院时间。在术后3个月和6个月对患者进行重新评估。
两组患者的基线特征相似。TURP组术前平均TRUS测量的前列腺体积为88±9.2 mL,PVP组为86.1±8.8 mL。TURP组的手术时间明显更短(51±17.2分钟对87±18.3分钟,P <0.05),PVP组的导尿管拔除时间(3.9±1.2天对1.7±0.8天,P <0.05)和住院时间(4.8±1.2天对2±0.7天,P <0.05)更短。在随访期内,IPSS、Qmax和PVR值有显著差异,TURP组更优。TURP组的前列腺体积缩小百分比显著更高。PVP组有7例患者需要再次手术,而TURP组无此情况。
尽管在术中及围手术期安全性方面PVP优于TURP,但对于前列腺体积大于70 mL的前列腺增生患者,TURP的早期功能结果优于PVP。