康斯坦特-默里肩关节评估中测试者内部和测试者间可靠性的评估。
Evaluation of intratester and intertester reliability of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment.
作者信息
Rocourt Marianne H H, Radlinger Lorenz, Kalberer Fabian, Sanavi Shahab, Schmid Nicole S, Leunig Michael, Hertel Ralph
机构信息
Head Office of Nursing, Medical Technical and Medical Therapeutic Administration, Physiotherapy Development and Research, Inselspital Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
出版信息
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.024.
This study evaluated the reliability of the Constant-Murley Score. Two testers assessed 63 patients twice on the same day using the original publication by Constant and Murley. The intratester reliability of the total score was high and the differences between the tests were small; 2 of 14 items were unreliable. The intertester reliability was high, but there were significant median differences of the total score; 12 of 14 items were unreliable. We believe that the differences between the testers were due to the brief explanations of test components in the original publication. The reliability of the Constant-Murley Score could possibly be improved by a better standardization of the assessment procedure.
本研究评估了Constant-Murley评分的可靠性。两名测试者依据Constant和Murley的原始出版物，在同一天对63名患者进行了两次评估。总分的测试者内信度较高，两次测试之间的差异较小；14项中有2项不可靠。测试者间信度较高，但总分存在显著的中位数差异；14项中有12项不可靠。我们认为测试者之间的差异是由于原始出版物中对测试组件的解释过于简略。通过更好地规范评估程序，Constant-Murley评分的可靠性可能会得到提高。
Zotero 插件