• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[个体前列腺癌筛查的一般实践调查]

[General practical survey of individual prostate cancer screening].

作者信息

Guy L, van de Steene E, Védrine N, Teissonnière M, Boiteux J-P

机构信息

Service d'urologie, hôpital G. Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2008 Jan;18(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2007.10.006
PMID:18342156
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the practices of general practitioners in the Auvergne region concerning individual prostate cancer screening, to compare these practices with published guidelines and to identify those points that are most difficult to perform.

MATERIAL

An anonymous postal survey using a predefined questionnaire was conducted among 1339 general practitioners in the Auvergne region identified by the URSSAF file on 1st January 2006. This was a declarative survey with no individual financial reward. The questionnaire comprised three aspects: general practitioner identification criteria, screening practices and the doctors' opinion concerning guidelines.

RESULTS

The participation rate was 49.1: 98.3% of general practitioners declared that they proposed screening and 89.5% declared that they proposed screening to all men within certain age limits, from 50 to 75 years in 80.8% of cases. Only 4.6% of doctors provided complete preliminary information to their patients. Among the doctors,75.6% combined digital rectal examination and total PSA assay, but in the presence of an abnormality, only 10.5% referred their patients directly to an urologist without prescribing other complementary investigations (first- or second-line). Finally, 53.5% of doctors considered that published guidelines were adapted to their clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Individual prostate cancer screening is massively proposed, but differences are observed between the doctors' reported practices and official guidelines. This study emphasizes the need to provide patients with clear and complete information and to improve the general practitioners' knowledge on screening tests and patient referral in the case of positive screening tests.

摘要

目的

评估奥弗涅地区全科医生开展个体前列腺癌筛查的情况,将这些做法与已发布的指南进行比较,并确定最难实施的要点。

材料

采用预定义问卷对2006年1月1日由URSSAF文件确定的奥弗涅地区1339名全科医生进行匿名邮寄调查。这是一项无个人经济奖励的陈述性调查。问卷包括三个方面:全科医生识别标准、筛查做法以及医生对指南的看法。

结果

参与率为49.1%:98.3%的全科医生表示他们会建议进行筛查,89.5%的医生表示他们会在特定年龄限制内(80.8%的情况为50至75岁)向所有男性建议进行筛查。只有4.6%的医生向患者提供了完整的初步信息。在医生中,75.6%的人同时进行直肠指检和总前列腺特异性抗原检测,但在发现异常时,只有10.5%的人直接将患者转诊给泌尿科医生,而没有开具其他补充检查(一线或二线检查)。最后,53.5%的医生认为已发布的指南适用于他们的临床实践。

结论

大规模开展个体前列腺癌筛查,但医生报告的做法与官方指南之间存在差异。本研究强调需要为患者提供清晰完整的信息,并提高全科医生在筛查试验方面的知识以及在筛查试验呈阳性时患者转诊方面的知识。

相似文献

1
[General practical survey of individual prostate cancer screening].[个体前列腺癌筛查的一般实践调查]
Prog Urol. 2008 Jan;18(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
2
[Practice patterns of general practitioners in the Loire-Atlantique region and their patients' knowledge of prostate cancer screening].[卢瓦尔河大西洋省全科医生的执业模式及其患者对前列腺癌筛查的了解]
Prog Urol. 2006 Nov;16(5):559-63.
3
[Prostate cancer screening].[前列腺癌筛查]
Prog Urol. 2003 Apr;13(2):209-14.
4
[PSA: the difficult position of general practitioners between patients and urologists].[前列腺特异性抗原:全科医生在患者与泌尿科医生之间的困境]
Prog Urol. 2003 Apr;13(2):252-5.
5
[General practitioners' approach to urination disorders in men over the age of 50. A survey of 250 physicians in Brittany].[全科医生对50岁以上男性排尿障碍的处理方法。对布列塔尼250名医生的调查]
Prog Urol. 1996 Feb;6(1):52-9.
6
Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: evidence, controversies and future perspectives.基于前列腺特异性抗原的前列腺癌筛查:证据、争议与未来展望。
Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02293.x. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
7
[The general practitioner's part in the initiation of diagnostic procedures in prostate cancer].[全科医生在启动前列腺癌诊断程序中的作用]
Aktuelle Urol. 2008 Mar;39(2):141-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993037.
8
[Epidemiology of prostate cancer in the Limousin area].[利穆赞地区前列腺癌的流行病学]
Prog Urol. 2002 Apr;12(2):226-31.
9
Screening for prostate cancer: a survey of New Zealand general practitioners.前列腺癌筛查:新西兰全科医生调查
N Z Med J. 2003 Jun 20;116(1176):U476.
10
RACGP training registrars' perceptions and practice of prostate cancer screening.皇家澳大利亚全科医生学院培训注册医生对前列腺癌筛查的认知与实践
Aust Fam Physician. 2004 Mar;33(3):188-90.

引用本文的文献

1
[Rates of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer: a first comparison of German results with current international data].[用于前列腺癌早期检测的前列腺特异性抗原检测率:德国结果与当前国际数据的首次比较]
Urologe A. 2014 May;53(5):715-24. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3453-0.
2
Prostate specific antigen testing policy worldwide varies greatly and seems not to be in accordance with guidelines: a systematic review.全球范围内前列腺特异性抗原检测政策差异很大,似乎不符合指南:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 11;13:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-100.