Johnson Christine C, Burkman Ronald T, Gold Melanie A, Brown Robert T, Harel Zeev, Bruner Ann, Stager Margaret, Bachrach Laura K, Hertweck S Paige, Nelson Anita L, Nelson Dorothy A, Coupey Susan M, McLeod Alison, Bone Henry G
Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202-3450, USA.
Contraception. 2008 Apr;77(4):239-48. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
This analysis was conducted to assess the baseline data and design methodology within an observational longitudinal comparison of use vs. nonuse of the injectable (intramuscular) contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) and its effect on bone mass in adolescent women.
A prospective, observational, open-label, unmatched-cohort, safety study in females aged 11-18 years. Participants either self-selected DMPA-IM (Depo-Provera) 150 mg to be administered every 12 weeks for up to 240 weeks with a 120-week post-treatment follow-up or were nonusers (users of nonhormonal contraception or sexually abstinent) who were to be followed up for up to 360 weeks. As each participant entered the study, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, hip and femoral neck regions, along with total body bone mineral content; serum and urine specimens were obtained for assay of bone metabolism markers and participants' histories of parity and tobacco and alcohol use were obtained.
A total of 389 participants were enrolled: 169 elected to begin DMPA-IM; 26 chose nonhormonal methods and 194 were abstinent. The baseline characteristics indicated significant disparities between DMPA-IM users and nonusers: compared with the nonusers, DMPA-IM users had more advanced chronologic and gynecologic ages, were more likely to have smoked, been pregnant and included more blacks. These factors would likely influence bone accretion rates independent of DMPA-IM exposure. Comparison of participant BMDs with standard reference data revealed that the study cohorts did not match reference populations closely enough to make a direct between-cohort comparative analysis feasible.
The baseline differences in cohort characteristics preclude a meaningful comparison of mean BMD changes over time between DMPA-IM users and nonusers cohorts, and comparisons of changes in Z-scores between cohorts were also not appropriate. Therefore, within-participant BMD decreases from baseline were established as safety thresholds, and the proportion of individuals crossing those thresholds on a persistent or progressive basis was identified as the revised primary end point.
本分析旨在评估在一项关于青少年女性使用与不使用注射用(肌肉注射)醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针(DMPA-IM)及其对骨量影响的纵向观察性比较研究中的基线数据和设计方法。
一项针对11至18岁女性的前瞻性、观察性、开放标签、非匹配队列安全性研究。参与者自行选择每12周注射150mg DMPA-IM(Depo-Provera),最长持续240周,并在治疗后进行120周的随访;或者为非使用者(使用非激素避孕方法或禁欲者),随访最长360周。每位参与者进入研究时,通过双能X线吸收法测量腰椎、髋部和股骨颈区域的骨密度(BMD)以及全身骨矿物质含量;采集血清和尿液样本用于检测骨代谢标志物,并获取参与者的生育史以及吸烟和饮酒史。
共招募了389名参与者:169人选择开始使用DMPA-IM;26人选择非激素方法,194人禁欲。基线特征表明DMPA-IM使用者与非使用者之间存在显著差异:与非使用者相比,DMPA-IM使用者的实际年龄和妇科年龄更大,更有可能吸烟、怀孕,且黑人更多。这些因素可能会独立于DMPA-IM暴露影响骨生长速率。将参与者的BMD与标准参考数据进行比较后发现,研究队列与参考人群不够匹配,无法进行直接的队列间比较分析。
队列特征的基线差异使得无法对DMPA-IM使用者和非使用者队列随时间的平均BMD变化进行有意义的比较,并且队列间Z分数变化的比较也不合适。因此,将参与者BMD从基线水平的降低确定为安全阈值,并将持续或渐进超过这些阈值的个体比例确定为修订后的主要终点。