N'Jai Alhaji, Boverhof Darrell R, Dere Edward, Burgoon Lyle D, Tan Ying S, Rowlands J Craig, Budinsky Robert A, Stebbins Kenneth E, Zacharewski Timothy R
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Toxicol Sci. 2008 Jun;103(2):285-97. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfn053. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
Temporal analyses were performed on hepatic tissue from immature female C57BL/6 mice in order to compare the gene expression profiles for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibzofuran (TCDF). Time course studies conducted with a single oral dose of 300 microg/kg TCDF or 30 microg/kg TCDD were used to compare differential gene expression on complementary DNA microarrays containing 13,361 features, representing 8194 genes at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 72, 120, and 168 h. One hundred and ninety-five genes were identified as differentially regulated by TCDF, of which 116 genes were in common with TCDD, with 109 exhibiting comparable expression profiles (correlation coefficients > 0.3). In general, TCDF was less effective in eliciting hepatic vacuolization, and differential gene expression compared with TCDD when given at an equipotent dose based on a toxic equivalence factor (TEF) of 0.1 for TCDF, especially 72-h postadministration. For example, the induction of Cyp1a1 messenger RNA by TCDF was less when compared TCDD. Moreover, TCDF induced less severe hepatocyte cytoplasmic vacuolization consistent with lower lipid accumulations which significantly subsided by 120 and 168 h when compared with TCDD. TCDF-elicited responses correlated with their hepatic tissue levels which gradually decreased between 18 and 168 h. Although both compounds elicited comparable gene expression profiles, especially at early time points, the TCDF responses were generally weaker. Collectively, these results suggest that the weaker TCDF responses could be attributed to differences in pharmacokinetics. However, more comprehensive dose-response studies are required at optimal times for each end point of interest in order to investigate the effect of pharmacokinetic differences on relative potencies that are important in establishing TEFs.
对未成熟雌性C57BL/6小鼠的肝脏组织进行了时间分析,以比较2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并对二恶英(TCDD)和2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并呋喃(TCDF)的基因表达谱。用300微克/千克TCDF或30微克/千克TCDD单次口服剂量进行的时间进程研究,用于比较在含有13361个特征、代表8194个基因的互补DNA微阵列上,在2、4、8、12、24、72、120和168小时时的差异基因表达。195个基因被鉴定为受TCDF差异调节,其中116个基因与TCDD相同,109个表现出可比的表达谱(相关系数>0.3)。一般来说,基于TCDF的毒性当量因子(TEF)为0.1,在等剂量给药时,TCDF诱导肝脏空泡化和差异基因表达的效果比TCDD差,尤其是在给药后72小时。例如,与TCDD相比,TCDF诱导的Cyp1a1信使核糖核酸较少。此外,TCDF诱导的肝细胞胞质空泡化较轻,这与较低的脂质积累一致,与TCDD相比,在120和168小时时显著减轻。TCDF引发的反应与其肝脏组织水平相关,肝脏组织水平在18至168小时之间逐渐下降。虽然两种化合物引发的基因表达谱可比,尤其是在早期时间点,但TCDF的反应通常较弱。总体而言,这些结果表明,TCDF反应较弱可能归因于药代动力学差异。然而,需要在每个感兴趣终点的最佳时间进行更全面的剂量反应研究,以研究药代动力学差异对相对效力的影响,这在确定TEF中很重要。