• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性偏头痛研究中的安慰剂反应。

The placebo response in studies of acute migraine.

作者信息

Fernandes Ricardo, Ferreira Joaquim J, Sampaio Cristina

机构信息

Pediatrics Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):527-33, 533.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.024. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.024
PMID:18346509
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the magnitude of the placebo response in trials of migraine therapy in children and adolescents, and to identify its determinants.

STUDY DESIGN

MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched through November 2006 for randomized controlled trials or controlled clinical trials of pediatric acute migraine pharmacologic treatment that included a placebo comparator group. The main outcomes were headache relief and pain-free response, and effect estimates for risk differences were calculated whenever possible. The influence of placebo response determinants was studied using subgroup analysis. A total of 13 trials (1324 participants in the placebo groups) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled placebo responses for pain relief and pain-free at 2 hours were 46% (range, 38% to 53%) and 21% (range, 17% to 26%). Parallel studies conducted in North American centers demonstrated a significantly higher placebo response, as did trials that used 4-point pain scales. Other placebo determinants did not influence the effect estimate, although insufficient data were available to study some of them.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a widely variable placebo response in pediatric migraine trials, supporting the continued use of placebo groups and suggesting the need for more research into the placebo effect in the pediatric population.

摘要

目的

描述儿童和青少年偏头痛治疗试验中安慰剂反应的程度,并确定其决定因素。

研究设计

检索MEDLINE和CENTRAL数据库至2006年11月,查找儿科急性偏头痛药物治疗的随机对照试验或对照临床试验,这些试验需包含安慰剂对照分组。主要结局为头痛缓解和无痛反应,并尽可能计算风险差异的效应估计值。使用亚组分析研究安慰剂反应决定因素的影响。分析共纳入13项试验(安慰剂组有1324名参与者)。

结果

2小时时疼痛缓解和无痛的合并安慰剂反应分别为46%(范围38%至53%)和21%(范围17%至26%)。在北美中心进行的平行研究显示安慰剂反应显著更高,使用4分制疼痛量表的试验也是如此。其他安慰剂决定因素未影响效应估计值,不过研究其中一些因素的数据不足。

结论

儿科偏头痛试验中的安慰剂反应差异很大,这支持继续使用安慰剂组,并表明需要对儿科人群中的安慰剂效应进行更多研究。

相似文献

1
The placebo response in studies of acute migraine.急性偏头痛研究中的安慰剂反应。
J Pediatr. 2008 Apr;152(4):527-33, 533.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.09.024. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
2
Placebo effects in oral triptan trials: the scientific and ethical rationale for continued use of placebo controls.口服曲坦类药物试验中的安慰剂效应:继续使用安慰剂对照的科学与伦理依据。
Cephalalgia. 2005 Feb;25(2):124-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00817.x.
3
Placebo efficacy in childhood and adolescence migraine: an analysis of double-blind and placebo-controlled studies.安慰剂在儿童和青少年偏头痛中的疗效:双盲和安慰剂对照研究分析
Cephalalgia. 2009 Apr;29(4):436-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01752.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
4
Placebo response in the prophylaxis of migraine: a meta-analysis.
Eur J Pain. 2008 Jan;12(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
5
A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study of MAP0004 in adult patients with migraine.一项关于MAP0004治疗成年偏头痛患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Headache. 2009 Jun;49(6):826-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01453.x.
6
Efficacy, speed of action and tolerability of almotriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: pooled individual patient data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.阿莫曲坦用于偏头痛急性治疗的疗效、起效速度及耐受性:来自四项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的个体患者数据汇总
Cephalalgia. 2006 Apr;26(4):400-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01080.x.
7
Predictors of migraine headache recurrence: a pooled analysis from the eletriptan database.偏头痛复发的预测因素:来自依立曲坦数据库的汇总分析。
Headache. 2008 Feb;48(2):184-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00868.x.
8
Age effects on placebo response rates in clinical trials of acute agents for migraine: pooled analysis of rizatriptan trials in adults.年龄对偏头痛急性治疗药物临床试验中安慰剂反应率的影响:利扎曲普坦成人试验的汇总分析
Cephalalgia. 2009 Jul;29(7):711-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01788.x. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
9
Acute treatment of paediatric migraine: a meta-analysis of efficacy.儿童偏头痛的急性治疗:疗效的荟萃分析
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Jan;44(1-2):3-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01206.x. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
10
The importance of placebo in headache research.安慰剂在头痛研究中的重要性。
Cephalalgia. 2008 Oct;28(10):1003-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01660.x. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Teenagers' and parental attitudes towards the use of placebo pills.青少年和家长对安慰剂丸使用的态度。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):1425-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04801-4. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
A randomized controlled pilot study of intranasal lidocaine in acute management of paediatric migraine and migraine-like headache.一项关于鼻内利多卡因在小儿偏头痛及偏头痛样头痛急性治疗中的随机对照试验研究。
Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jun 23;27(6):340-345. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac054. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?
关于儿科主题的系统评价是否需要特殊的方法学考量?
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0812-1.
4
PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research.PRISMA儿童版(C)和PRISMA儿童研究方案版(P-C)扩展:一项关于制定新生儿和儿童健康研究系统评价与荟萃分析实施及报告指南的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e010270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010270.
5
Intranasal sumatriptan for migraine in children.儿童偏头痛的鼻内舒马曲坦治疗
Can Fam Physician. 2015 May;61(5):435-7.
6
Oral triptans in children and adolescents: an update.儿童和青少年使用的口服曲坦类药物:最新进展
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015 Mar;19(3):8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-015-0478-z.
7
Nocebo effect in randomized clinical trials of antidepressants in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年抗抑郁药随机临床试验中的反安慰剂效应:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Nov 3;8:375. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00375. eCollection 2014.
8
The development and assessment of biological treatments for children.儿童生物治疗的开发与评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;79(3):379-94. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12406.
9
Placebo and other psychological interactions in headache treatment.安慰剂及头痛治疗中的其他心理交互作用。
J Headache Pain. 2012 Apr;13(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s10194-012-0422-0. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
10
The placebo enigma revisited.再探安慰剂之谜。
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Aug;11(4):340-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-4-340.