Suliman Ahmed, Greenberg Joshua I, Angle Niren
Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;22(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.11.001.
Venous hypertension due to proximal central venous outflow obstruction coexisting with a functioning arteriovenous fistula in the ipsilateral arm presents with a complex management problem in hemodialysis patients. Ligation of the arteriovenous communication is the simplest procedure to relieve symptoms; however, this sacrifices the patient's hemodialysis access, which may be the only available access in that patient. Surgical bypass of the occlusion is a potential option as it obviates the symptoms of venous hypertension while preserving dialysis access. Our objective was to evaluate our experience and outcome with dialysis patients undergoing surgical bypass for symptomatic central venous obstruction and dialysis access salvage. There were three hemodialysis patients with severe venous hypertension secondary to subclavian vein obstruction who had functioning ipsilateral arteriovenous fistulae. All underwent cephalic vein (n = 2) or axillary vein (n = 1) to internal jugular vein bypass of the obstructed subclavian segment via an 8-mm polytetrafluoroethylene bridge graft. All patients had unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) attempts prior to surgical bypass. In two patients, a wire could not be passed through the occlusion; in the third, PTA was only transiently successful despite four repeated procedures. All patients had complete resolution of symptoms without operative mortality. The bypass grafts remained patent, allowing the arteriovenous fistulae to provide functional access for the entire duration of follow-up after surgery (3-8 months). Surgical bypass of a central vein obstruction relieves the symptoms of venous hypertension and prolongs the use of the existing hemodialysis access. This surgical option should be well recognized within the dialysis community.
近端中心静脉流出道梗阻导致的静脉高压与同侧手臂有功能的动静脉瘘并存,给血液透析患者带来了复杂的管理难题。结扎动静脉交通支是缓解症状最简单的方法;然而,这会牺牲患者的血液透析通路,而这可能是该患者唯一可用的通路。对闭塞部位进行外科搭桥是一种潜在的选择,因为它在保留透析通路的同时消除了静脉高压的症状。我们的目的是评估对有症状的中心静脉梗阻并进行透析通路挽救的血液透析患者进行外科搭桥的经验和结果。有3例血液透析患者因锁骨下静脉梗阻继发严重静脉高压,其同侧有功能的动静脉瘘。所有患者均通过8毫米聚四氟乙烯桥接移植物,将头静脉(2例)或腋静脉(1例)与颈内静脉进行搭桥,绕过受阻的锁骨下节段。所有患者在外科搭桥前经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)尝试均未成功。2例患者导丝无法通过闭塞部位;第3例患者尽管进行了4次重复操作,PTA仅短暂成功。所有患者症状完全缓解,无手术死亡。搭桥移植物保持通畅,使动静脉瘘在术后整个随访期间(3 - 8个月)都能提供有效的通路。中心静脉梗阻的外科搭桥可缓解静脉高压症状,并延长现有血液透析通路的使用时间。这种手术选择应在透析界得到充分认识。