Suppr超能文献

生物及合成移植物在盆腔手术中的应用:综述

Biologic and synthetic graft use in pelvic surgery: a review.

作者信息

Jakus Sharon M, Shapiro Alex, Hall Cynthia D

机构信息

Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008 Apr;63(4):253-66. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318166fb44.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are some of the most commonly treated conditions in postmenopausal women. Surgical cure rates vary greatly depending on surgical technique and the type of materials used, if any, to supplement the native tissue. Traditional colporrhaphy relies on adequate tissue for a successful repair. The main concern associated with traditional plication or needle suspension type repairs is that the use of intrinsic attenuated tissue may provide a weak, constricted, or an anatomically incorrect result. Graft use allows for a broader base of support and eliminates the need to rely on the existing weakened fascia and musculature. A review of the existing literature on success rates and complications with various synthetic and biologic graft materials yielded the following conclusions. The superiority of graft use over traditional suture suspensions for abdominal sacrocolpopexy and suburethral sling procedures has clearly been shown in the literature. Macroporous monofilament synthetic grafts and non-cross-linked biologic grafts appear to have the best integration into native tissues. Solvent dehydration and irradiation of biologic grafts may weaken the integrity of the material and may prevent proper tissue integration. Technical factors related to surgical technique may impact success rates, such as tension on suture line or failure to use vaginal packing. The perfect graft material has not yet been created. Suggestions for further research include more prospective, randomized trials comparing synthetic and biologic grafts, tension-free versus secured mesh, and absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to recall how common urinary incontinence is, explain the historical considerations for diagnosis and treatment, and summarize the updated methods of treatment based upon anatomical structures and pathophysiology.

摘要

未标注

尿失禁和盆腔器官脱垂是绝经后女性最常治疗的疾病。手术治愈率因手术技术和所使用的(如有)补充天然组织的材料类型而有很大差异。传统的阴道修补术依靠足够的组织来实现成功修复。与传统的折叠或缝针悬吊式修复相关的主要问题是,使用内在变薄的组织可能会导致修复效果不佳、狭窄或解剖结构不正确。使用移植物可提供更广泛的支撑基础,并且无需依赖现有的薄弱筋膜和肌肉组织。对现有关于各种合成和生物移植物材料成功率及并发症的文献进行综述后得出以下结论。在腹骶阴道固定术和尿道下吊带手术中,使用移植物优于传统缝线悬吊术,这在文献中已得到明确证明。大孔单丝合成移植物和非交联生物移植物似乎与天然组织的整合效果最佳。生物移植物的溶剂脱水和辐照可能会削弱材料的完整性,并可能妨碍组织的正常整合。与手术技术相关的技术因素可能会影响成功率,例如缝线张力或未使用阴道填塞物。尚未找到完美的移植物材料。进一步研究的建议包括进行更多前瞻性、随机试验,比较合成移植物和生物移植物、无张力网片与固定网片,以及可吸收网片与不可吸收网片。

目标受众

妇产科医生、家庭医生

学习目标

阅读本文后,读者应能够回忆起尿失禁的常见程度,解释诊断和治疗的历史考量,并根据解剖结构和病理生理学总结最新的治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验