Suppr超能文献

用于恒牙龋病去除的荧光控制铒钇铝石榴石激光:一项随机临床试验。

Fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser for caries removal in permanent teeth: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Dommisch Henrik, Peus Katja, Kneist Susanne, Krause Felix, Braun Andreas, Hedderich Jürgen, Jepsen Søren, Eberhard Jörg

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Apr;116(2):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00521.x.

Abstract

The aim of this randomized clinical study was to compare the efficacy of a fluorescence-controlled erbium-loaded yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser with conventional bur treatment for caries therapy in adults. Twenty-six patients with 102 carious lesions were treated using either the Er:YAG laser, at threshold levels of 7, 8, 9, and 10 [U], or rotary burs. Both techniques were applied to each lesion at separate locations. After treatment, dentine samples were obtained using a carbide bur. The viable counts of Streptococcus mutans (SM) and lactobacilli (LB) [expressed as colony-forming units (log10 CFUs)], treatment time, pain, vibration, and sound intensity were determined. The median numbers of CFUs for SM and LB were not statistically different between laser and bur treatment at threshold levels 7 and 8 [U]. At threshold levels 9 and 10 [U], the median number of CFUs for LB [1.11 (range: 0.00-2.04)] were significantly higher following laser treatment than following bur treatment [0.30 (range: 0.00-0.60)]. The results indicate that treatment with a fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser at threshold levels of 7 and 8 removed caries to a level similar to that achieved using conventional bur treatment, with clinically irrelevant amounts of remaining bacteria. Although more time consuming, laser treatment provided higher patient comfort than bur treatment.

摘要

这项随机临床研究的目的是比较荧光控制的掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光与传统牙钻治疗成人龋齿的疗效。26名患有102处龋损的患者分别接受了阈值为7、8、9和10 [U] 的Er:YAG激光治疗或旋转牙钻治疗。两种技术分别应用于每个龋损的不同部位。治疗后,使用硬质合金牙钻获取牙本质样本。测定变形链球菌(SM)和乳酸菌(LB)的活菌计数[以菌落形成单位(log10 CFUs)表示]、治疗时间、疼痛、振动和声强。在阈值7和8 [U] 时,激光治疗和牙钻治疗的SM和LB的CFUs中位数无统计学差异。在阈值9和10 [U] 时,激光治疗后LB的CFUs中位数[1.11(范围:0.00 - 2.04)]显著高于牙钻治疗后的[0.30(范围:0.00 - 0.60)]。结果表明,阈值为7和8的荧光控制Er:YAG激光治疗龋损的程度与传统牙钻治疗相似,残留细菌量在临床上无关紧要。虽然激光治疗耗时更长,但与牙钻治疗相比,患者舒适度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验