Davies M, Lavalle-González F, Storms F, Gomis R
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 May;10(5):387-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00873.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
For many patients with type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) do not provide optimal glycaemic control, necessitating insulin therapy. Fear of hypoglycaemia is a major barrier to initiating insulin therapy. The AT.LANTUS study investigated optimal methods to initiate and maintain insulin glargine (LANTUS, glargine, Sanofi-aventis, Paris, France) therapy using two treatment algorithms. This subgroup analysis investigated the initiation of once-daily glargine therapy in patients suboptimally controlled on multiple OADs.
This study was a 24-week, multinational (59 countries), multicenter (611), randomized study. Algorithm 1 was a clinic-driven titration and algorithm 2 was a patient-driven titration. Titration was based on target fasting blood glucose < or =100 mg/dl (< or =5.5 mmol/l). Algorithms were compared for incidence of severe hypoglycaemia [requiring assistance and blood glucose <50 mg/dl (<2.8 mmol/l)] and baseline to end-point change in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)).
Of the 4961 patients enrolled in the study, 865 were included in this subgroup analysis: 340 received glargine plus 1 OAD and 525 received glargine plus >1 OAD. Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was <1%. HbA(1c) decreased significantly between baseline and end-point for patients receiving glargine plus 1 OAD (-1.4%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.3% vs. algorithm 2 -1.5%; p = 0.03) and glargine plus >1 OAD (-1.7%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.5% vs. algorithm 2 -1.8%; p = 0.001).
This study shows that initiation of once-daily glargine with OADs results in significant reduction of HbA(1c) with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. The greater reduction in HbA(1c) was seen in patients randomized to the patient-driven algorithm (algorithm 2) on 1 or >1 OAD.
对于许多2型糖尿病患者而言,口服降糖药(OADs)无法实现最佳血糖控制,因此需要胰岛素治疗。对低血糖的恐惧是启动胰岛素治疗的主要障碍。AT.LANTUS研究使用两种治疗方案,调查了启动和维持甘精胰岛素(来得时,甘精胰岛素,赛诺菲-安万特公司,法国巴黎)治疗的最佳方法。该亚组分析研究了在多种口服降糖药治疗效果欠佳的患者中启动每日一次甘精胰岛素治疗的情况。
本研究是一项为期24周的多国家(59个国家)、多中心(611个)随机研究。方案1是由诊所主导的滴定法,方案2是由患者主导的滴定法。滴定法以空腹血糖目标值≤100mg/dl(≤5.5mmol/l)为基础。比较两种方案严重低血糖(需要协助且血糖<50mg/dl(<2.8mmol/l))的发生率以及血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)从基线到终点的变化。
在该研究纳入的4961例患者中,865例被纳入该亚组分析:340例接受甘精胰岛素加1种口服降糖药治疗,525例接受甘精胰岛素加1种以上口服降糖药治疗。严重低血糖发生率<1%。接受甘精胰岛素加1种口服降糖药治疗的患者,HbA1c从基线到终点显著下降(-1.4%,p<0.001;方案1为-1.3%,方案2为-1.5%;p = 0.03);接受甘精胰岛素加1种以上口服降糖药治疗的患者,HbA1c也显著下降(-1.7%,p<0.001;方案1为-1.5%,方案2为-1.8%;p = 0.001)。
本研究表明,每日一次将甘精胰岛素与口服降糖药联合使用可显著降低HbA1c,且低血糖风险较低。在随机分配至由患者主导的方案(方案2)接受1种或1种以上口服降糖药治疗的患者中,HbA1c下降幅度更大。